Re: Nightmare with inbox case (Inbox / INBOX)

[Oswald B. <osw...@gm...>]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:28:29PM +0100, Florian Lombard wrote:
> M: >>> 11 UID FETCH 124336 (INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[])
> M: * 6038 FETCH (UID 124336 INTERNALDATE "05-Oct-2016 14:52:57 +0000" 
> BODY[] {64216}
> 
> S: >>> 11 APPEND "INBOX" (\Seen) "05-Oct-2016 16:52:57 +0200" {64238+}
> M: >>> 12 UID FETCH 124338 (INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[])
> S:  BAD Command Error. 10
> IMAP error: unexpected tag BAD
> 
> Is this legit to have the message size with a + sign at the end ?!
> 
that's the literal+ extension. it's applied to all messages < 100k.

> And why is it different from the source size ?
>
mbsync injects an x-tuid header.

> (I tried to read the RFC822 but didn't find the answer)
> 
well, that's a dinosaur. and the wrong one at that.
rfc3501 is the starting point. then, google imap + particular
capabilities reported with -Dn.