From: Pete H. <pe...@is...> - 2005-07-10 17:32:52
|
> VoIP falls where? It is a combination of channels. Channels are points to test but it's not uncommon that technologies will continue to cross the boundaries. If I have to test an office that has PDAs that use wireless LANs to transmit calls via VOIP, I would need to test mostly all 5 channels at least in part. > Just call it Human Interaction .. or People .. or something like that? like HUMSEC? > > I like mimicing the SIG INT type names. If we want more open adoption, we should use terms that are used at places that take security seriously. > True. ut it gets complicated sticking with military specs. For example: 1.Personnel Security (humsec) 2.Physical Security (physsec, opsec) 3.Telecommunications Security (comsec) 4.Wireless Communications Security (sigsec, elsec) 5.Data Networks Security (comsec) So how does the military differentiate data network security from telecommunications? > I like the terms from the rainbow series and the common criteria. Common Criteria is a world wide standard, not just a US thing. > I searched through looking for channel names but came up light. Suggestions on definitions misused in 2.1 that could be changed? -pete. |