[Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [linux-iscsi-devel] iSCSi Perfs

[Ming Z. <mi...@el...>]

iet will sync each write. so write performance will of course lower. but
i am glad to see the read performance is much better. :P

ming

On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 16:36 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:33:28AM -0400, Pascal Renauld wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >=20
> > I have been doing some performance comparaisons between
> > the different iSCSI initiators (Linux, Open-iSCSi and Microsoft)
> > using the IET 0.4.7 and a commercial implementation on NetBSD.
> > All the tests were conducted using Iometer with 100% sequential
> > access and a serie of 5 runs (100% write, 80%write 20% read,
> > 50% write 50% read, 20% write 80% read, 100% read) for
> > different transfer sizes (8KB to 128KB).
> > The results are attached in the included Excel file.
> > One of my question is why is the IET much slower in the 100% write
> > runs compared to the NetBSD implementation? Thoughts?
> > What do people think about the numbers? How can they be improved?
>=20
> Care to provide it in a sane format aswell?  The current attachment
> is totally useless unfortunately.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, =
4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=3D20
> _______________________________________________
> linux-iscsi-devel mailing list
> lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-iscsi-devel