From: Ming Z. <mi...@el...> - 2004-08-25 15:10:58
|
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 08:50, Ming Zhang wrote: > On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 04:03, Libor Vanek wrote: > > > Hi, I tested .30 r/w performance today. > > > > > > Initiator: > > > 2 dell pc with P4 2.6G 1GRAM, Intel Pro1000T. but due to the 32 bit PCI > > > slot, it can only achieve 500Mb/s. 1 run windows xp sp1, 1 run windows > > > 2003. windows 2000 get very similar results with windows 2003. usually > > > no difference or 1mb/s slower. > > > > > > Target: > > > Dell poweredge 2600, dual 2.4ghz, 1G ram. 1 intel pro1000t nic. > > > 1 15k rpm scsi disk. and 1 hardware sata raid. > > > > > > > Good job! One small comment about setup - my experiences with SATA RAIDs (and I've built 10s of them!) are that if you use 3Ware card (there is no other one with good Linux drivers and >= 8 SATA ports) it's faster (20-50%!!!) to use SW RAID 5 instead of HW RAID 5. If you were using RAID1/RAID0 then it doesn't matter. And oh - you have to use reasonable number of disks (6 or more - the more the better). Can you provide some info about disk number, speed (rpm) and controller? > this is an external sata raid we bought from somewhere i do not know. we > connect it with system using a aic7xxx ultra 160 card. most disk i use > are seagate 7200rpm 120GB or 160GB. > > i have a 3ware 95xx card with raid0. similar disks. i will test some > data now. i use this 3ware card, hardware raid0, 6 disks. get 40MB/s write while still 40MB/s read. but my 3ware raid should be much faster than this number. > > > > > Thanks, > > Libor -- -------------------------------------------------- | Ming Zhang, PhD. Student | Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering | College of Engineering | University of Rhode Island | Kingston RI. 02881 | e-mail: mingz at ele.uri.edu | Tel. (401) 874-2293 | Fax. (401) 782-6422 | http://www.ele.uri.edu/~mingz/ | http://crab.ele.uri.edu/gallery/albums.php -------------------------------------------------- |