From: Michal L. <mi...@lo...> - 2005-01-25 22:37:15
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: | VANHULLEBUS Yvan <va...@fr...> wrote: | |>NAT-T support has been updated to support NATT RFCs (default if |>--enable-natt) and also all draft versions (disabled by default, |>--enable-natt_xx to enable draft xx support). | | That changes the semantics --enable-natt had previous releases. What | about doing this? | --enable-natt enable all | --enable-natt-xx enable draft xx support | --enable-natt-rfc enable only RFC support What about --enable-natt=00,02,05,rfc and simple --enable-natt be equal to 00,02,rfc (or whatever)? |>I will probably commit it on the devel. branch next week, but please |>test it on the 0.5 RC version (maybe it would be interesting to |>generate a new SNAP release ?) if you can. | | Well, we clearly need a rc2. | I suspect it would have been better to release 0.5 and quickly do 0.6 | with the new features. If we don't stop adding features to 0.5, we will | never release it. I'm pretty much off-line these days, but I'll try to make rc2 ASAP. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB9j2nDDolCcRbIhgRAra8AJ41/6L420iHXhNsY0KJpIkUJ7mZ8wCgup20 y6K/Y6wMRE+WKyrWSEtPiic= =8d4p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |