That draft should be the input to a separate set of work. Some things, such as it being 'stateless' sound good but also do not apply to things like redirecting all TCP connections to a single port (for transparent proxying.)
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 180 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1882566
Originator: NO
Equivalent Change Request for Solaris is 6600474.
first set of patches committed (should be close to complete if not)
Logged In: YES
user_id=1448875
Originator: NO
Have committed first set of working code that swaps addresses and ports around and at least gets the new TCP checksum right.
File Added: cvs.diffs.bz2
Have you considered reworking this patch in light of the IETF's work on NAT66 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrw-behave-nat66 ?
That draft should be the input to a separate set of work. Some things, such as it being 'stateless' sound good but also do not apply to things like redirecting all TCP connections to a single port (for transparent proxying.)
I've filed a seperate bug to track that specific feature:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2656860&group_id=169098&atid=849056
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 180 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).