From: miketech m. <mik...@gm...> - 2008-03-13 21:00:22
|
Hi All, a customer of mine wanted Asterisk on IPCop, while doing this job I wrote down some notes and this guide came out. If some brave could test the iso image and the package, I'll be glad. Also feedback for the howto is welcome. The document is here: http://www.cupovoip.com/docs/asterisk-installation-ipcop-english.html the Italian version is here: http://www.cupovoip.com/docs/installazione-asterisk-ipcop-italiano.html Thanks for your attention, Mike |
From: John E. <jo...@co...> - 2005-06-28 23:56:55
|
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:56:13PM -0600, Rich Vigh wrote: > Newbie question: has anyone successfully gotten IPCop to work in a low > power, rack-mount box? Preferably, an embedded computer? Something like a > Soekris net4801? Or anything else? Hi I've not personally used their kit but these guys have ITX boards and rackmount cases, as well as ship compact flash cards with IPCop preinstalled: http://linitx.com/ If you want to build your own, then most other ITX motherboards will work with Linux, but best to check that the ethernet adapter's chipset is supported. -- #---------------------------------------------------------# | John Edwards Email: jo...@co... | | | | A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion | | Q. Why is top posting bad ? | #---------------------------------------------------------# |
From: Eric S. <er...@na...> - 2005-06-29 13:18:34
|
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 00:56 +0100, John Edwards wrote: > If you want to build your own, then most other ITX motherboards will > work with Linux, but best to check that the ethernet adapter's chipset > is supported. Rich, I'm running IPCop on a VIA CL6000E (600MHz C3, dual LAN). The VIA boards usually employ VIA's own brand of chip, supported by the via-rhine driver. I tossed in a dual Intel 8255* card for a total of four interfaces. The whole thing probably draws around 30W and is whisper-quiet. I'm tickled to death with this setup and would recommend it in a heartbeat. The Soekris boards probably use natsemi ethernet chips, but that is just a guess based on the fact that the Geode CPU is NatSemi technology as well. I couldn't make out the writing on the chips from the website photograph. ;) The 2.6 kernel has a sub-arch target, CONFIG_MGEODEGX1, but I don't know what it would gain you over standard x86 support that you get in 2.4. IPCop of course uses 2.4, so it should be just fine. Good luck, and let us know how it goes with the Soekris if you decide to go that route. Eric |
From: Eric S. <er...@na...> - 2005-06-30 11:17:50
|
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:39 -0600, Rich Vigh wrote: > Eric, > Thanks for the response. > I have a couple of quick questions: > > What kind of case do you have for your setup? Rackmount? If so, how > many U? Where did you buy the case from? Rich, It's not a rackmount case, but the same company does make a couple of those. It's a Casetronic 2699R that I bought from Directron: http://www.directron.com/2699r.html Casetronic's rackmount cases are here: http://www.casetronic.com/products/Rackmount/1U-Rackmount/1U-Rackmount.asp > Is your Intel 8255 NIC a low-profile card? No, in fact it is a full-height card. It mounts horizontally in the 2699R, and I even had to take a Dremel to the far side of the PCI slot opening to make it fit. It's a very small case! Eric |
From: Darren C. <da...@kd...> - 2005-06-30 12:39:36
|
Eric Sproul wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:39 -0600, Rich Vigh wrote: > >>Eric, >>Thanks for the response. >>I have a couple of quick questions: >> >>What kind of case do you have for your setup? Rackmount? If so, how >>many U? Where did you buy the case from? > > > Rich, > It's not a rackmount case, but the same company does make a couple of > those. It's a Casetronic 2699R that I bought from Directron: > http://www.directron.com/2699r.html > > Casetronic's rackmount cases are here: > http://www.casetronic.com/products/Rackmount/1U-Rackmount/1U-Rackmount.asp > > >>Is your Intel 8255 NIC a low-profile card? > > > No, in fact it is a full-height card. It mounts horizontally in the > 2699R, and I even had to take a Dremel to the far side of the PCI slot > opening to make it fit. It's a very small case! > I would be very wary of the Casetronic cases, even though the Via Epia boards are low power, they consume more than the Casetronic can supply. We have about 30 VIA CL-10000 boards out there in the Casetronic 2699, the VIA boards are an ideal board for IPcop. If you are using a harddrive in the box, you will find that when the box warms up, when you come to power down and power back (say after a power failure situation), that the hard drive will not spin as the 50Watt powersupply cannot provide enough current to spin the drive. The system will not come up. Casetronic has another case that comes with a slightly bigger powersupply 60Watts I believe, and even that one fails after a while. The configuration of our boxes was VIA CL-10000, 512 Megs of RAM, a Samsung or Maxtor 40 Gig Harddrive. (and on one or two boxes we put in a third NIC). Nothing unreasonable about what we were putting in the boxes, but about 90% exihibit the inability to restart after powering down. I talked to our local rep, who laughed and said powersupply has not enough juice to do the job. For our customers that were having the most trouble with this issue, we repacked the via boards in to slim cases, at which time we found another nice quirk of the VIA CL-10000 boards. If you pull the power and plug it back in real quick (kind of like when you have one of those quick power failures and your box is not on a UPS). The unit will go into a locked state where you have to unplug it for 5 minutes before you can get it going again. This resulted in us putting a UPS on every unit we sold so that this situation was avoided. The VIA CL-10000 is a nice little board for running Ipcop, but I would stay away from Casetronic/Morex 2699 Cases, they do not have the amperage in the power supplies. I now run my VIA in a normal case, which sucks because I wanted a low power and quiet solution. Darren |
From: Eric S. <er...@na...> - 2005-06-30 13:19:50
|
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 05:45 -0700, Darren Critchley wrote: > I would be very wary of the Casetronic cases, even though the Via Epia > boards are low power, they consume more than the Casetronic can supply. Hi Darren, We had this same discussion the last time I mentioned this case. :) I am using a slightly older model of VIA board, and a laptop drive, and I have not seen this problem. Nevertheless, I agree that the Casetronic power supply is *just* enough for a minimum setup. Rich, if you want to go rackmount, Casetronic's 1U cases all have internal AC power supplies that should be just fine for running an IPCop setup. Alternatively, Serener's fanless ITX cases would be a nice choice for a silent desktop form-factor system. Logic Supply (www.logicsupply.com) is the only North American supplier of Serener cases. There is a nice review of the GS-L01 at http://www.bigbruin.com/reviews05/serener/index.php?file=1 . The approved list of VIA boards is small due to some custom parts made by Serener (it's all in the review). The M10000 is supported, as is the new SP13000. Somewhat expensive but worth it (according to the reviewer) considering the engineering that went into the product. Cheers, Eric |
From: Eric S. <er...@na...> - 2005-06-30 14:44:32
|
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:39 -0600, Rich Vigh wrote: > Is your Intel 8255 NIC a low-profile card? I was going to look up the card model, but IPCop lacks the PCI device database, so lspci only returns numbers (no mfr/model names). Fortunately, I am a pack-rat when it comes to email. The card is a Compaq NC3122 that I bought for $25 on Ebay about a year ago. As I said, it was a tough fit in my case, but you may have an easier time with full-height cards in a rackmount case, as they'll be wider than most ITX desktop cases. Cheers, Eric |
From: Srini <sri...@gm...> - 2007-04-12 13:28:58
|
Yeah, looks like the ISP DNS servers are having some issues .. it would still be interesting to know if there are any "tweaks" for the IPCop DNS. The reason I ask is although a name resolution is done successfully, after a few seconds it fails again .. I would assume that IPCop would have cached it right ? Srini On 4/12/07, William Warren <hes...@em...> wrote: > > just set a client machine to your isp's or another dns server manually > and you'll bypass ipcop. However unless you are either running severely > underpowered or you are running your ipcop severely overloaded the issue > is most likely your isp's dns server running slowly. > > Srini wrote: > > Hi All > > > > The DNS lookup is really slow. Looking at IPCop's web gui there is no > place > > where the DNS caching can be tweaked .. for eg. even though a particular > > site's NS is retrieved, after sometime nslookup again times out. > > > > So how does one tweak the DNS caching like TTL etc etc > > > > Also for testing purpose is it possible to disable DNS caching ? > > > > Regards > > Srini > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > > IPCop-user mailing list > > IPC...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user > > > > > > > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta1 (P3Scan 2.2.1) > > AntiSpam: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 > > AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.90.1/3079 - Wed Apr 11 22:30:11 2007 > > by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org > > > > -- > My "Foundation" verse: > Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and > every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt > condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their > righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. > > -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" > CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician) > > Linux user #322099 > Machines: > 206822 > 256638 > 276825 > http://counter.li.org/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > IPCop-user mailing list > IPC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user > |
From: Dave <mat...@ms...> - 2007-04-17 02:26:37
|
I might try that like I said I have hard drive but he isn't happy how complicated is it to set up. I all ready have one dinosaur has a file server and print server don't laugh he is a Pentium one yea I know old guy but has a print server and a file server it works great. So I will check into that does any one on here that has there own network have any pics I am just starting to build my built my own network rack or what ever you want to call it. Luckily I have friends in the construction business with lots of scraps it got built and hey it don't look that bad.. One thing I did that I don't think is that hot but maybe it is I took two old fans that I have had for many years they came out of a real old server nothing else was real usable except hard drives and the fans so I had a friend who does electricity wire then into house power yea he checked this are for that kind of electricity the house kind not sure if all is but they are but any ways and ran a cord and switch right now I have to turn it on and off but evenly I would like to either put in a timer or find a way to mount a thermostat and if it gets above a certain temp then it kicks in any ideas on that. normally high temps are not a problem we have been in the low 70'2 and celebrating a heat wave. but where I have my server and every thing else is back in a corner and I am afraid that the heat the machines generate will heat it up being in a corner so any ideas any one else build there own racks if so got pictures. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernhard Bitsch" <Ber...@gm...> To: <ipc...@li...> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:26 PM Subject: Re: [IPCop-user] new > Thx Chad, for the translation! > I saw the post, but didn't read it because of the long "wild" text. > Shame on me. > > Now for the answer of the question. > You have the possibility to do an installation with two floppies and a > little web server on another computer connected peer to peer to the new > IPCop machine. > I use it myself. My IPCop has a floppy drive only. > I'm using tinyweb ( http://www.ritlabs.com/tinyweb/ ) with tinybox ( > http://freenet-homepage.de/ralph.becker/tinybox/ ) as GUI frontend. > Dave, in case of more questions or problems, don't hesitate to contact > me by mail. > > Bernhard > > Chad Neeper (list) schrieb: > >>I may not be able to answer the question, but I think I can translate it: >> >>He has an old computer that won't boot via CDROM. He wants to know if he >>can install IPCOP in a box that does boot via CDROM and then move the >>hard drive to the old computer. >>If legit, his writing style is due to brain damage. (So, kudos to him >>for persevering.) >> >>----------------------- >>Chad Neeper >>Senior Systems Engineer >> >>Level 9 Networks >>740-548-8070 (voice) >>866-214-6607 (fax) >> >>-- Full LAN/WAN consulting services -- >>-- Specialized in libraries and schools -- >> >> >> >>Quiliro Ordóñez wrote: >> >> >>>what? >>>El Domingo, 15 de Abril de 2007 18:31, Dave escribió: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Ok I am new here and new to ip cop this is my network looking at help >>>>and >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>suggestion I have DSL that comes into my modem then I did have to going >>>into >>>a router but the router died so after attending mass for it to start it's >>>journey into the bliss. . ok so I was talking to a guy who I am buying a >>>switch from his suggestion which I am taking is to where the router was >>>pout >>>an older computer has fire wall and router. so I found an older slow >>>computer >>>for that duty I tried using wall but had some troubles one of the big >>>things >>>I don't think those older computer I am going to use has the option of >>>boot >>>from the cd rom. so to install I have to move the hard drive over to >>>another >>>computer install to the hard drive and move it back. so first off what is >>>the >>>basics of ipcop of a computer second will it set up the way it I have to >>>do >>>and lastly sorry for typos I used be a total nerd then taking a flight on >>>a >>>chopper that decided it dint want to fly and though the ground look >>>better s >>> >>> >>> >>>> limmed in to the earth very hard the wreak didn't hurt it was that >>>> sudden >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>stop at the end, so through I wound up with a brain injury and recovering >>>from that the bg thing is the way I write stuff so sorry about that >>>another >>>area I have noticed took big hit You used to able to look me in a room >>>with >>>a new program and I would figure it out now that don't work so I have to >>>exercise my brain figuring things out so hope fully I don't ask stupid >>>questions. >>> >>> >>> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >>>>control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >>>>http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>IPCop-user mailing list >>>>IPC...@li... >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > IPCop-user mailing list > IPC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user > |
From: Lawrence B. <lb...@u4...> - 2007-04-17 11:26:38
|
"Dave" <mat...@ms...> writes: >I have hard drive but he isn't happy how >complicated is it to set up. Not very complicated at all if you have the most basic of hardware. Please answer: does the computer you want to use for IPCop have a 3.5" floppy drive and can you put a CD-ROM drive into it (even if you cannot boot from the CD)? You will be more successful swapping a CD-ROM into the IPCop computer, using the boot-floppy/CD-install method, and removing the CD-ROM when done than you will be trying to swap the main hard drive back and forth. Matthew 7:24-27 |
From: Fajar P. <fa...@gm...> - 2007-05-31 05:14:40
|
On 5/31/07, Lawrence Bean <lb...@u4...> wrote: > > Yes, ORANGE uses no local services so you need to hard-code their private > IP addresses, gateways, and masks. You have to use an upstream public DNS > server to be able to acess FQDNs on the internet from ORANGE. ORANGE > cannot *initiate* any connections to GREEN or BLUE, so if you have (for > instance) a backup server that needs to connect to GREEN clients on a > schedule to automatically pull data for backup you have to set up pinholes > to do that. Lastly, if you plan to do any VPN into your network and want > convenient access to ORANGE machines (say for remote desktop), then use a > subnet for ORANGE that is within a convenient block. For instance, > 192.168.0.0/24 for GREEN > 192.168.1.0/24 for ORANGE > 192.168.2.0/23 for BLUE > all fall within the 192.168.0.0/22 block > > Hi Lawrence, Can you elaborate more on this subnetting? I thought it should be 192.168.0.0/16 ? -- Cheers, Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org Let's use OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org |
From: Lawrence B. <lb...@u4...> - 2007-05-31 12:03:57
|
"Fajar Priyanto" <fa...@gm...> writes: >Can you elaborate more on this subnetting? >I thought it should be 192.168.0.0/16 ? Sure, if you plan to have 65,533 computers. My schools are small, so we do not expect to have any more than 250 hard-wired machines, 250 shared servers and appliances (printers and such), and 500 wireless clients at any one time in any one building. We have four buildings interconnected with VPN and do not want the subnets to step on each other, so our entire block is 192.168.0.0/20 (255.255.240.0) covering 192.168.0.0-192.168.15.255 broken down into the four buildings: 192.168.0.0/22 (255.255.252.0) covering 192.168.0.0-192.168.3.255 192.168.4.0/22 (255.255.252.0) covering 192.168.4.0-192.168.7.255 192.168.8.0/22 (255.255.252 0) covering 192.168.8.0-192.168.11.255 192.168.12.0/22 (255.255.252.0) covering 192.168.12.0-192.168.15.255 with each building broken down into three subnets: GREEN: 192.168.0.0/24 (255.255.255.0) covering 192.168.0.0-192.168.1.255 ORANGE: 192.168.1.0/24 (255.255.255.0) covering 192.168.1.0-192.168.2.255 BLUE: 192.168.2.0/23 (255.255.254.0) covering 192.168.2.0-192.168.3.255 etc ... Actually, I use a block in the 172.x.x.x range, but the concept is the same. If you're new to subnetting, masks, and CIDR notation, here's a nice calculator that can help: http://jodies.de/ipcalc |
From: Ben B. <be...@ba...> - 2007-09-05 15:20:26
|
Perfect... that's exactly the sort of info I was looking for! So does that mean any shared resources that I want in Orange... printers and servers... need to be physically connected to a different switch? Or is that what you use a change in subnet mask value for? Following on from that - do Green Orange and Blue all need to have the same subnet mask value and internal IP address range? Everything here is on the standard 192.168.1.x Apart from the connection between Red IPCop and the ADSL router which is 192.168.2.1 Thanks Ben On 05/09/07, Lawrence Bean <lb...@u4...> wrote: > > "Ben Bradley" <be...@ba...> writes: > >one thing that's always confused... blue and orange networks! > > Green is trusted and has free access to Blue, Orange, and Red > Blue is untrusted, but has free access to Orange and Red > Orange is vulnerable and only has free access to Red > > > > > >I've had a wireless access point here but just > >connected to our network switch. > > Giving potential wireless hitch-hikers access to Green > > > >people have been using their IPCop boxes as wireless access points > >How does it work? > >Or do you plug a wireless access point into a 3rd NIC? > > Exactly - do not try adding a "wireless card" to the IPCop machine. Be > aware that Blue needs some special configurations depending on what > wireless clients you want to allow/disallow. Try searching the archives > for "Blue Access" for prior discussions. > > > >would I have to do something special to allow people connected via > >wireless to see all the printers, servers and other computers > > This is what Orange is for. Put all your "shared resources" (servers, > network printers, etc) in Orange and they can be accessed by Blue and > Green clients. Then if they get compromised, they cannot spread the hurt > elsewhere. You can also use "DMZ Pinholes" to allow specific access from > Blue to Green, but in my experience you'll be happier with Orange if you > have an IPCop box that supports 4 NICs. > > |
From: Lawrence B. <lb...@u4...> - 2007-09-05 15:48:17
|
"Ben Bradley" <be...@ba...> writes: >So does that mean any shared resources that I want in Orange... printers >and >servers... need to be physically connected to a different switch? Correct. You want four nics, red connected to your ADSL, green, blue, and orange NICs connected to their own switches assuming you'll have more than one client in Green, more than one WAP in Blue, and more than one shared resource in Orange. >do Green Orange and Blue all need to have the same >subnet mask value and internal IP address range? Green, Blue, and Orange each need their own non-overlapping subnet. You can use any non-overlapping subnets you want in 192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x, and the special 172.x.x.x range, but I always suggest using neighboring subnet blocks, e.g.: Green=192.168.4.0/24 (up to 253 trusted clients) Orange=192.168.5.0/24 (up to 253 shared resources) Blue=192.168.6.0/23 (Up to 508 wireless access points and wireless clients) all of which falls within the 192.168.4.0/22 block There's a really nice subnetting calculator that will also help you convert subnet mask to CIDR notation and show you how many clients you'll get with a specific combination at: http://jodies.de/ipcalc |
From: Lawrence B. <lb...@u4...> - 2007-09-25 19:03:53
|
"Doc. Caliban" <doc...@gm...> writes: >However, when I open up my config file, the word 'transparent' is >already there. That was the fix I was trying to dredge up - sorry, I'm at a dead end for you, other than to say if you turn off Blue Proxy and everything works fine, and you turn on Blue Proxy and everything stops working, you've found the problem (if not the solution). I know it doesn't help to say this, but my home IPCop is a fresh install of 1.4.16 w/AdvProxy 2.1.5 and it's working fine. That would suggest it is not simply a problem with the default install of the software, which would suggest it is some kind of a configuration issue. I realize you want to be up and running asap, so rather than chasing problems through log and config files my next suggestion is to back up your current config to floppy, re-install ipcop 1.4.16 from scratch, and test your blue access through transparent proxy from the default install. If it works fine, add AdvProxy and try again. If you check your access at each stage of configuration, you'll either find exactly what step causes the trouble, or you'll have a working unit and you can throw your config backup away. At any time in the process you want to go back to where you were, just re-install with a restore from floppy and you'll be exactly there in five minutes. Maybe someone will have another idea that will be quicker, but I do not recall anyone else saying anything about this issue recently and 1.4.16 has been out for a while. |
From: Doc. C. <doc...@gm...> - 2007-09-25 19:47:25
|
Lawrence Bean wrote: > I realize you want to be up and running asap, so rather than chasing > problems through log and config files my next suggestion is to back up > your current config to floppy, re-install ipcop 1.4.16 from scratch, and > test your blue access through transparent proxy from the default install. > If it works fine, add AdvProxy and try again. If you check your access at > each stage of configuration, you'll either find exactly what step causes > the trouble, or you'll have a working unit and you can throw your config > backup away. At any time in the process you want to go back to where you > were, just re-install with a restore from floppy and you'll be exactly > there in five minutes. > I very much appreciate all your help here. I'm going to build a separate box and try what you've suggested. When you do a backup of settings, does it pick up every setting for every add-on as well? I found the following file: /var/ipcop/porxy/settings and it has the first two lines: TRANSPARENT_BLUE=off ENABLE_BLUE=off Changing settings in the GUI doesn't seem to touch these entries. I changed them to 'on' and restarted the proxy service from the GUI, and restarted squid from the command line. Still no help, but that file does seem suspicious. -Doc |
From: Kevin B. <ke...@k2...> - 2007-10-16 14:49:16
|
Shock, The problem with this scenario is that remote admin only pertains to the WAN side access on 99% of the WAP's out there. Using the LAN side so as to bridge your wireless clients to the blue network and obtain IP addresses from the cop box should make that irrelevent. If the AP is on a static IP on the LAN side and connected to the blue NIC then I should be able to ping that AP and gain access to the admin pages without having to jump through hoops, at least according to what I read in the docs on green having full access to blue. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Shocky <sh...@us...> To: ipc...@li... Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:39:37 -0600 Subject: Re: [IPCop-user] green to blue router problem On Monday 15 October 2007 14:29, Robert W. Chall Jr. wrote: > I have a problem with an IPCop 1.4.16 installation I just did. I can not > access the Linksys WRT54GS router on the BLUE interface from any machine on > the Green interface network. I have remote administration enabled on the > Linksys. A TRACRT ends at the BLUE interface on the IPCop when initiated > from a machine on the GREEN interface network. Any ideas what might be > wrong or where I might look for an answer? I have been fighting with this > for over a week now and I have not made any progress so any help would be > very much appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Robert > Network Administrator > BLM Associates I have a similar setup working, although my blue router is a Netgear MR814v2. When I turned on remote management on the blue router, there was a setting for who gets access. I set it to the ip of my green router, because it's a NAT router. I remember having trouble at first because I was setting to the ip of one of the machines on my green network, but the blue router never sees that ip, so it wouldn't let me in. Also, be sure you're coming in on the right port. Mine uses 8080 by default, but it's configurable. And you're trying the ip of the blue router itself, not the blue NIC on IPCop, right? I don't remember having to do anything special on IPCop to get this working (but it was quite a while ago). -- These are my opinions. Get your own. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ [http://get.splunk.com/] _______________________________________________ IPCop-user mailing list IPC...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user] |
From: Lawrence B. <lb...@u4...> - 2007-10-16 15:05:37
|
"Kevin Bednar" <ke...@k2...> writes: >If the AP is on a static IP on >the LAN side and connected to the blue NIC then I should be able to ping >that AP and gain access to the admin pages without having to jump through >hoops I don't remember you mentioning this earlier as part of the troubleshooting, so I'll throw out even if redundant ... Have you tried making a direct connection from a client to the LAN port on the WAP, thereby taking IPCop completely out of the picture, to ensure the trouble is not with the WAP? Have you tried connecting the WAP to Green to ensure the trouble only happens when connected to Blue? You mention the WAP having a static IP ... have you tried having the WAP pick up its IP via DHCP from IPCop Blue and added the hardware address as a fixed dynamic address as well as adding the IP/MAC to "Blue Access"? Have you double-checked your Blue IP address(es), range, and subnet mask to ensure there isn't a simple typo causing weirdness? |
From: Kevin B. <ke...@k2...> - 2007-10-16 15:19:19
|
Lawrence, Yes, If I connect to the AP via wireless I can ping it and get to the admin interface, as well as get to the internet. I have the static IP registered in the blue access list as well. The only way to assign a DHCP address is to utilize the WAN port on the AP and put the wireless clients on their own subnet off of the AP which I dont want, as I'm time limiting certain users to certain times of day based on MAC address and logging their IP's in the proxy, which will break if I use the WAN port on the AP since all traffic will now appear to come from one mac address. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: "Lawrence Bean" <lb...@u4...> To: "Kevin Bednar" <ke...@k2...> Cc: ipc...@li... Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:08:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [IPCop-user] green to blue router problem "Kevin Bednar" <ke...@k2...> writes: >If the AP is on a static IP on >the LAN side and connected to the blue NIC then I should be able to ping >that AP and gain access to the admin pages without having to jump through >hoops I don't remember you mentioning this earlier as part of the troubleshooting, so I'll throw out even if redundant ... Have you tried making a direct connection from a client to the LAN port on the WAP, thereby taking IPCop completely out of the picture, to ensure the trouble is not with the WAP? Have you tried connecting the WAP to Green to ensure the trouble only happens when connected to Blue? You mention the WAP having a static IP ... have you tried having the WAP pick up its IP via DHCP from IPCop Blue and added the hardware address as a fixed dynamic address as well as adding the IP/MAC to "Blue Access"? Have you double-checked your Blue IP address(es), range, and subnet mask to ensure there isn't a simple typo causing weirdness? |
From: Fajar P. <fa...@gm...> - 2008-03-14 01:47:57
|
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:00 AM, miketech miketech <mik...@gm...> wrote: > Hi All, > > a customer of mine wanted Asterisk on IPCop, > while doing this job I wrote down some notes and this guide came out. > > If some brave could test the iso image and the package, I'll be glad. > Also feedback for the howto is welcome. Hi Mike, It's very interesting. I'll try it soon. -- Cheers, Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org Let's use OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org |
From: <mik...@gm...> - 2008-03-14 16:10:37
|
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:48:02 +0700 "Fajar Priyanto" <fa...@gm...> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:00 AM, miketech miketech <mik...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > a customer of mine wanted Asterisk on IPCop, > > while doing this job I wrote down some notes and this guide came out. > > > > If some brave could test the iso image and the package, I'll be glad. > > Also feedback for the howto is welcome. > > Hi Mike, > It's very interesting. I'll try it soon. > -- > Cheers, > Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org > Let's use OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org Hi Fajar, thanks for supporting. Note that those documents are not yet published: they aren't linked from the main docs page, here: http://www.cupovoip.com/docs/ because before publishing I'd like to check them with the IPCop community. So thanks again and have a nice day, Mike |
From: Greg C. E. <gc...@ci...> - 2008-03-14 22:21:03
|
mik...@gm... wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:48:02 +0700 > "Fajar Priyanto" <fa...@gm...> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:00 AM, miketech miketech <mik...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> a customer of mine wanted Asterisk on IPCop, >>> while doing this job I wrote down some notes and this guide came out. >>> >>> If some brave could test the iso image and the package, I'll be glad. >>> Also feedback for the howto is welcome. >>> >> Hi Mike, >> It's very interesting. I'll try it soon. >> -- >> Cheers, >> Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org >> Let's use OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org >> > > > Hi Fajar, > > thanks for supporting. > > Note that those documents are not yet published: > they aren't linked from the main docs page, here: > http://www.cupovoip.com/docs/ > > because before publishing I'd like to check them with the IPCop community. > > > So thanks again and have a nice day, > Mike > is this a good idea? |
From: nix4me <ni...@cf...> - 2008-03-21 00:39:02
|
John Edwards wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:19:14PM -0400, nix4me wrote: > >> John Edwards wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:20:58PM -0400, nix4me wrote: >>> <snip> >>> >>> >>>> How about ALiX??? >>>> >>> Who the hell is ALiX??? >>> >> ALiX is an embedded platform. >> http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php?cPath=60_83&products_id=450 >> > > That webpage says it uses an AMD Geode LX800 CPU, which is x86 > compatible and so the CPU should be supported by IPCop *now*. My > original message was about non-x86 CPUs (such as Alpha, SPARC or > PowerPC). > > Of course it doesn't say what they use for Ethernet, USB, etc, so > no way to say if those have drive support in the current 2.4 kernel. > > > As it lacks a VGA display and keyboard, then if you will have to use a > serial console to login then that might be a problem as the mingetty > program on IPCop 1.4 does not support logins over the serial port > (last time I looked). In IPCop 2.0 this will not be a problem as it > uses agetty, which does serial logins. For more info on serial > consoles see: > http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/Serial/serial-console.html > > > The install is done by copying the CF image to the card, so that > doesn't need serial console access. > > They look to be interesting bits of kit, have you actually used one? > > > I have its predecessor, the WRAP. I use m0n0wall on it because of the WRAPs low resources. Works GREAT! I am interested in replacing my WRAP board with the new ALiX. If I do, I want to try IPCOP because i prefer Linux to BSD for traffic shaping. |
From: John E. <jo...@co...> - 2008-03-15 21:21:01
|
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 09:17:26PM +0700, IPCop wrote: > Anyone here that's running IPCop on a CF with IDE-adapter? Lots of people do. You can even buy CF with IPCop preinstalled. > Any problems or issues? Only one - don't install from the normal CDROM. There is a mkflash script in the source code that you run on a working IPCop system that builds a disk image that you copy to the CF. To reduce wear on the flash memory the script modifies IPCop to use a ramdisk for cache and log files, which are copied to the flash memory at shutdown and then restored again at boot. If you don't want to build one then some sites offer them as downloads. > Does the CF-guide on the IPCop website comply with the latest version of > IPCop? Works with the latest released version of IPCop 1.4.18 on i386 PCs (Intel, AMD, VIA, etc) and maybe Alpha CPUs as well. I've been working to update it in the development branch, which will include support for SPARC and PowerPC machines. I don't know if anyone does use CF on non-PC CPUs but it's useful to cover these systems for completness. If anyone does use CF on Alpha, SPARC or PowerPC then let me know if you want to test things on a spare system. -- #---------------------------------------------------------# | John Edwards Email: jo...@co... | #---------------------------------------------------------# |
From: John E. <jo...@co...> - 2008-03-19 02:25:30
|
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:20:58PM -0400, nix4me wrote: <snip> > How about ALiX??? Who the hell is ALiX??? -- #---------------------------------------------------------# | John Edwards Email: jo...@co... | | | | A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion | | Q. Why is top posting bad ? | #---------------------------------------------------------# |