|
From: Ming Z. <mi...@el...> - 2006-11-14 21:23:39
|
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 11:19 -1000, Ching, Jimen (US SSA) wrote: > > we discussed about whether use 4KB or 512B for this field for > > a while and then think not to send unaligned request is more > > important. > > Ok. I have two followup questions. > > 1. Does the use of 4KB alignment apply to raw disk tests as well? > Or just filesystem based tests? depends on what kind of raw device u use. if a scsi disk, then probably 512b, but if a MD or LVM, then might be 4KB as well. > > 2. How does this alignment issue affect the 'Start Disk Sector' > field in the 'Disk Target' tab? Does it become a block offset? > And is it also affected by raw disk vs. filesystem tests? it will be block really. > > I downloaded the PDF documentation from your web site, and there's > not mention of these Linux issues. Are there any plans to update > the documentation? frankly no. i run out of time and am not a good writer anyway. i know it is important though. sigh... > > Thanks. > > --jc |