|
From: Sascha E. <fe...@do...> - 2013-03-04 10:07:15
|
Hello, thanks, you are right, fio could do the trick. My problem is, that I need to do it from serveral machines in parallel. I think I did not mention this. Perhaps I will try to do it with fio stareted synchronously by any kind of script. bests Sascha Am 28.02.2013 20:32, schrieb Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues: > Hi Sascha, > > This is neto from Brazil > > How are you? > > I believe that you can that with FIO using rate_iops > > Please let me know if you need any help > > All the best > > neto > NetApp - I love this company! > -----Original Message----- > From: Sascha Effert [mailto:fe...@do...] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 7:19 AM > To: iom...@li... > Subject: [Iometer-user] Limit IOpS > > Hello, > > I would like to measure the average and max response time of a storage system (SAN with SSDs) with different load. Therefore I want iometer to generate (about) 5000 IOPS (later about 10000, 20000, up to some hundred thousands). Is this possible using iometer? At the moment I do not see a way to solve this. Does anybody know any other tool solving this issue? > > If IOMeter does not allow to do so, I would like to play a little bit with the code. Therefore I want to implement a sleep after each IO. > Searching the code I found the TargetDisk implementing the Read and Write and the class Grunt, which is the IO worker. I am very unsure where I should place the sleep. I am searching something like a look where the single Requests are created. Can someone give an idea where to find it? > > bests > > Sascha > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > Iometer-user mailing list > Iom...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iometer-user |