[Introspector-developers] Fwd: Re: doubt about object oriented operating systems
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mdupont
|
From: James M. D. <mdu...@ya...> - 2003-01-17 16:00:13
|
Some people just have a BAD ATTITUDE! I hope that no one in the introspector project treats people like the new management of TUNES. --- James Michael DuPont <mdu...@ya...> wrote: > Delivered-To: tu...@be... > From: James Michael DuPont <mdu...@ya...> > Subject: Re: doubt about object oriented operating systems > To: Brian T Rice <wa...@tu...>, Sm...@ln... > CC: tu...@tu... > --- Brian T Rice <wa...@tu...> wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 Sm...@ln... wrote: > > > > > what do you mean by object oriented operating systems? what is > the > > basic > > > concept of object oriented operating systems? what are its > > advantages? > > > > Go troll somewhere else. If you have to ask this question, you are > in > > the > > wrong place at the wrong time. > > Hey, Simita.K, > Please excuse Brians tone. I dont think he means it personally. > > I have often got onto his wrong side, but I dont think that he hates > me > as a person, just stupid questions. > > He is a really smart guy, but does have the time to answering newbie > questions. > > You posed a good "newbie" question, but let me say, that tunes does > not > like the term "OO", see the page : > http://cliki.tunes.org:8000/Object-Oriented > > Check this out : > http://www.cs.arizona.edu/people/bridges/os/oop.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tunes is a project to replace existing Operating Systems, Languages, > and User Interfaces by a completely rethough Computing System, based > on > a correctness-proof-secure higher-order reflective self-extensible > fine-grained distributed persistent fault-tolerant version-aware > decentralized (no-kernel) object system. We want to implement such a > system because we know all these are required for the computing > industry to compete fairly, which is not currently possible. Even if > Tunes itself does not become a world-wide OS, we hope the TUNES > experience can speed up the appearance of such an OS that would > fulfill > our requirements. > > the link is broken, > http://acacia.ens.fr:8080/home/rideau/Tunes/Project_Members.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > If you look at the tunes definition of OS : > http://cliki.tunes.org:8000/Operating%20System > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > In the TUNES project, the term for any common cultural background > between different computers. > In the false-hearted paradigm imposed by computer industry, an > arbitrarily delimited part of a computing system that only deals with > limited, first-order, low-level services while inducing severe > "context-switch" overhead for every single operation. > > See the Operating Systems reviewed for examples. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > I dont think that tunes like the term "OO" > so i would say lets look at the cliki for > -------------------------------------------------- > Object > A unified term to manipulate computer abstractions. The name 'object' > is commonly used for that, although the first somewhat-unified frame > to > manipulate computer abstractions, namely Lisp, used lists. > The Tunes perspective is that any 'thing' spoken of in a system > counts > as an object; not merely those encoded in some particular way or > observing some particular properties of Being. > > Beware the fake: it's also a fad to be "Object-Oriented"! > > For example, when trying to "define" objects, some people say that an > object is something that "has a unique ID" (that is, can be > individually identified). Now what is a unique ID? In what space does > it live? This simply pushes other ideas of objects out to another > level. Identifying for the sake of being identifiable is of limited > value. Of course objects can be differentiated from each other, but > this should be done according to useful semantical differences. Just > saying "we consider objects" is enough and encompasses it. > -------------------------------------------------- > > So you can see that the idea of an object is important > to tunes, but they are questioning many of the preconceived ideas and > are breaking down the walls between the different software. > > mike ===== James Michael DuPont http://introspector.sourceforge.net/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com |