Re: [Inprotect-users] 1.9.3.002 build is on the svn

[Daniel D. <dd...@ma...>]

Ken,
Thanks for the detailed response; it is greatly appreciated as is your development on this project.  The features that you mention will be very valuable and we will look forward to their release.  Anything you can do to reduce the development time would be a big plus.

One last question: Do you have any recommendations for running this on a CentOS setup?  Is there any reason not to use the latest 5.4 release?

Thanks again,
Dan



From: Kenneth Kline
Sent: Tue 4/27/2010 5:53 PM
To: Inprotect Users : General questions & announcements
Subject: Re: [Inprotect-users] 1.9.3.002 build is on the svn


Dan,

	I wanted to push to get it out prior to new years.  I have been working on it 
currently to get some of the interface features for managing groups stuff.  I 
have not published some of the recent work back to SVN yet.  I doubt I will 
push for anything major to be released on until several features are enhanced 
and implemented.

a reporting wizard needs written yet.  I have been working to do some custom 
reporting to track changes and looking to do a delta and /or net remains view 
based on two reports.

A number of other features to really finish it out.  I will likely keep 
publishing minor changes over the course of this year before releasing a 2.0.  

I am not working to meet any timeline so get out a release that generates 
revenue so there is not true benefit to change from 1.x to 2.x naming anytime 
soon.  Part of being a perfectionist.

When I do hit 2.0, I am thinking to potentially give adobe flex a shot as it 
looks to have some promise and can save development time on the front end ( 
which is where all the time is spent )

Ken

On Monday 26 April 2010 05:55:49 pm Daniel Didier wrote:
> Ken,
> I appreciate the input; We'll run with 1.9 and look forward to seeing the
>  improvements.
> 
> I'm sure you've been asked this before, but do you feel a 2.0 will be
>  coming out soon?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> From: Kenneth Kline
> Sent: Mon 4/26/2010 5:32 PM
> To: Inprotect Users : General questions & announcements
> Subject: Re: [Inprotect-users] 1.9.3.002 build is on the svn
> 
> 
> USE 1.9
> 
> 1.0 is not being maintained.
> 
> 1.9 offers more table normalization, which means far more performance gain
>  and db space saving over 1.0.
> 
> Sexier reports, more feature rich, and a number of features that was not
> written per the 1.0 front end are now all considered per 1.9
> 
> Ken
> 
> On Monday 26 April 2010 11:16:56 am Daniel Didier wrote:
> > Kenneth,
> > Thanks for all of your effort on this project.  We are looking to deploy
> >  inprotect and wonder if you would recommend using version 1.0 or 1.9?
> >
> > Your input would be greatly appreciated - Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Kenneth Kline
> > Sent: Wed 3/10/2010 9:39 PM
> > To: Inprotect Users : General questions & announcements
> > Subject: [Inprotect-users] 1.9.3.002 build is on the svn
> >
> >
> > All it is available under SVN /trunk/Inprotect/builds/
> >
> > OpenVAS is supported.
> >
> > Need some help testing it:
> >
> > recommendations thus far is to disable plugins for the following under
> >  OpenVAS
> >
> > amap
> > ike-scan
> > porttranny (or such)
> >
> > Then things would really speed up!
> >
> > I have finally - published front-end pages to manage
> > ORG/SITE/SUBNETS/ASSET LISTS/ DMZ ranges.
> >
> > These are still being written/optimized/debugged by me, I have a few
> >  queries turned on within the pages under Group->[LIST|Subnet|DMZ]
> >
> > We have been converting the excel stuff over to use phpEXCEL.  I have
> > been working in the notes / exceptions tracking in all the report
> > formats.
> >
> > I redid the HTML.  I am currrently still working on it to provide toggle
> > between group by HOSTIP/SERVICE/SCRIPT id then can drill down according (
> > similar to the view of the Nessus Windows Client ) makes quick work of
> > identifying keys issues.
> >
> > I also put code in the full pdf report to truncate it when there is more
> >  than 1500 hits.  It starts showing risk from Highest to Lowest ( until
> > it hits that count and will leave out any lower risk value when report it
> > super big ).  I felt it is better to generate a partial report and
> > indicate truncated potentially low/infos from the report vs page time out
> > due to report being 2+ thousand pages exhausting memory etc trying to
> > generate.
> >
> > Still much to do
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-- --- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > inprotect-users mailing list
> > inp...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inprotect-users
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- _______________________________________________
> inprotect-users mailing list
> inp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inprotect-users
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
inprotect-users mailing list
inp...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inprotect-users