|
From: Karunakar G. <kar...@in...> - 2022-10-30 16:16:03
|
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 8:16 PM ashish agarwal <ash...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, as a native Hindi speaker, I wanted to point out that the ligature > for ब्द PIC1 isn't correct in the gargi font. It is too similar to द्व > (dva). While similarity alone doesn't mean that it is incorrect, in this > case, I should point out that I have never come across the ligature that > this font provides in real life > > > bda (wrong in the font): > it is dba and not bda द ् ब द्ब > [image: image.png] > > Yes, it was just added in font as a ligature, but perhaps no valid usage. It could be improved a bit to remove closeness to dva This is different that b+d like in श ब ् द - शब्द > dva (correct in your font, ignore the extra paren in the screenshot): > [image: image.png] > > dva is fine, sure it would be confusing with dba at low font size. > > bda (correct but not in the font): > > [image: image.png] > > This is half form of ba and already handled, when writing words like शब्द But thanks for your feedback. Good to see users of the font. Karunakar |