Re: [Indic-computing-users] Fw: indic languages important........
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jkoshy
From: Hema A M. <he...@la...> - 2002-09-24 08:23:03
|
I am not sure if this answers anything - I do think that this encoding issue and font based applications will continue to remain for quite a while. Unfortunately, until we have applications running in local languages nobody is going to use the=20 interfaces that we build. I think we should work towards solutions in which both encoding and font - are a kind of localisation. This is possible in linux and I do think we should explore this - define standards for interfaces that applications can use. An example: a) Cursor position APIs in X - could be either encoding based or glyph based=20 b) Input methods - any encoding based Both a) and b) could use parse rule files for encoding/ font ... We could define standards for these. Although I do agree that it will be good if we could agree on a particular encoding - in practice this is=20 going to be pretty difficult to enforce. -hema On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Tapan S. Parikh wrote: >=20 > I kind of missed some of the exact points, but one irony is that kinds > of points and applications he is bringing is the exact reason that > standards-compliance is important. >=20 > SQL Interpreters, DBs, Compilers. Chance is sooner or later they will > support Unicode. But will they support some font-based or otherwise > obscure encoding used by some subset of the Indian population?=20 > Unlikely. =20 >=20 > We can get away with writing word processors, email clients, etc. for a > while but are we really going to start writing our own enterprise DB > systems and commercial level compilers? >=20 > but at some point we have to come up with either an engineering or > policy approach for handling the standardisation and encoding issue if > people are not happy with Unicode. >=20 > -- Tapan >=20 > SQL DBs, Compilers, =20 >=20 > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:30:04 +0530 > Guntupalli Karunakar <kar...@fr...> wrote: >=20 > > Whats the opinion of group in this regard ? > > I will be meeting him when I next go to pune as he is also working on > > Marathi localisation. From the preliminary info that I got, he is > > using a Shusha kind of font. Though his implementation may not be > > standards complaint, but it is still an issue to ponder at. > >=20 > > Regards, > > Karunakar > >=20 > > Begin forwarded message: > >=20 > > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:36:31 +0530 > > From: "Somesh Bartakkay" <s4s...@re...> > > To: <kar...@sh...> > > Subject: indic languages important........ > >=20 > >=20 > > (ur ref. & this email address is given by shiriish bhagawat) > >=20 > > respected sir, > > i come to know that there was a national level conferance at > > bangalore on the topic - Indic computing... > >=20 > > i wanna share the following points: > >=20 > > 1.weather the implimentation of indic-languages is considered only > > upto document generation / data presentation or beyond that (e.g. > > writting programming in indic languages, writting sql statements in > > indic languages, shell/dos-commands in indic languages etc ) ? becuas= e > > most of the problem we are facing now in days regarding this topic ar= e > > only due to concideration of indic languages=20 > > only for document genereation..till yet nobody has thought beyond thi= s > > except me...i worked over it in proper way. > > i have developed small library for writting C programming language in > > devnagari... its an 100 % successful expmt.The entire s/w for windows > > is ready & for linux is on way to complete.=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > 2.weather the concepts of unicode is accepted by all languages ?=20 > > 3.here am fwding u a small html page. please read that u will come to > > know that other cuntries r also fighting with ANSI etc for changing > > the worldwide std of prog languages and base for fighting is LANGUAGE > > and SCRIPT, in this page NNI has refused the std of ANSI ..only as > > their language script is not having the symbols {}, [], # ... so ansi > > has given options for above symbols... > > means if u writting c prog is following way , gcc compiles it.. > >=20 > > main() > > <% > > printf("haha !!"); > > %> > >=20 > > please ref below url for more details on the topic above.... > >=20 > > http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/na1-NNI.html > >=20 > > 4. am attaching a jpg file with this mail, wich shows a small c like > > prorgam=20 > > in devnagari script and gcc compiles it with my library.the parallel > > prog in c is written below > >=20 > > main() > > { > > int a,b; > > scanf("%d",&a); > > b=3Da*a; > > printf("%d",b); > > } > >=20 > > ...... we must have to reach upto that level with n e indic script.... > > i know how to do this...........................for more information > > contact me, > > and plz dont furget to tell me if there is n e more conference on thi= s > > topic, wanna present few more imp topic s on this subject > > if possible plz forword this mail to the persons working in this > > field..=20 > >=20 > > =20 > > =A7 s.o.m.e.s.h =A7 > > =20 > > Somesh Bartakkay > > Ph: 02115-23100 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Indic-computing-users mailing list http://indic-computing.sourceforge.n= et/ > Ind...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/indic-computing-users > [Other Indic-Computing mailing lists: -devel, -standards, -announce] >=20 |