Re: [Indic-computing-users] Fw: indic languages important........
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jkoshy
From: Tapan S. P. <ta...@ya...> - 2002-09-24 08:08:56
|
I kind of missed some of the exact points, but one irony is that kinds of points and applications he is bringing is the exact reason that standards-compliance is important. SQL Interpreters, DBs, Compilers. Chance is sooner or later they will support Unicode. But will they support some font-based or otherwise obscure encoding used by some subset of the Indian population? Unlikely. We can get away with writing word processors, email clients, etc. for a while but are we really going to start writing our own enterprise DB systems and commercial level compilers? but at some point we have to come up with either an engineering or policy approach for handling the standardisation and encoding issue if people are not happy with Unicode. -- Tapan SQL DBs, Compilers, On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:30:04 +0530 Guntupalli Karunakar <kar...@fr...> wrote: > Whats the opinion of group in this regard ? > I will be meeting him when I next go to pune as he is also working on > Marathi localisation. From the preliminary info that I got, he is > using a Shusha kind of font. Though his implementation may not be > standards complaint, but it is still an issue to ponder at. > > Regards, > Karunakar > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:36:31 +0530 > From: "Somesh Bartakkay" <s4s...@re...> > To: <kar...@sh...> > Subject: indic languages important........ > > > (ur ref. & this email address is given by shiriish bhagawat) > > respected sir, > i come to know that there was a national level conferance at > bangalore on the topic - Indic computing... > > i wanna share the following points: > > 1.weather the implimentation of indic-languages is considered only > upto document generation / data presentation or beyond that (e.g. > writting programming in indic languages, writting sql statements in > indic languages, shell/dos-commands in indic languages etc ) ? becuase > most of the problem we are facing now in days regarding this topic are > only due to concideration of indic languages > only for document genereation..till yet nobody has thought beyond this > except me...i worked over it in proper way. > i have developed small library for writting C programming language in > devnagari... its an 100 % successful expmt.The entire s/w for windows > is ready & for linux is on way to complete. > > > 2.weather the concepts of unicode is accepted by all languages ? > 3.here am fwding u a small html page. please read that u will come to > know that other cuntries r also fighting with ANSI etc for changing > the worldwide std of prog languages and base for fighting is LANGUAGE > and SCRIPT, in this page NNI has refused the std of ANSI ..only as > their language script is not having the symbols {}, [], # ... so ansi > has given options for above symbols... > means if u writting c prog is following way , gcc compiles it.. > > main() > <% > printf("haha !!"); > %> > > please ref below url for more details on the topic above.... > > http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/na1-NNI.html > > 4. am attaching a jpg file with this mail, wich shows a small c like > prorgam > in devnagari script and gcc compiles it with my library.the parallel > prog in c is written below > > main() > { > int a,b; > scanf("%d",&a); > b=a*a; > printf("%d",b); > } > > ...... we must have to reach upto that level with n e indic script.... > i know how to do this...........................for more information > contact me, > and plz dont furget to tell me if there is n e more conference on this > topic, wanna present few more imp topic s on this subject > if possible plz forword this mail to the persons working in this > field.. > > > § s.o.m.e.s.h § > > Somesh Bartakkay > Ph: 02115-23100 > > > > > > > |