Re: [Indic-computing-devel] Re: What next on Indic?
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jkoshy
From: <jk...@Fr...> - 2003-12-03 06:14:40
|
> I'm wondering, have you integrated the changes to the doc/* tree yet ? No. If you are referring to the diff to doc/share/mk/*.mk---that was fairly intrusive and broke building the doc/ tree under BSD. I've been planning to rework the Makefiles in the share/mk directory to cleanly separate the path/filename specification bits from the rest of the make rules; this turns out to be un-straightforward the way the .mk files are currently written. We also need a way of separating the OS dependent bits from the rest of the make rules --- what does the output of `uname -a` look like on a Debian box? [RH/SuSE/Mandrake users, could you please post this for your systems too?] jk> 'cd' to src/package-definitions/doc-toolchain/debian, jk> and type 'make package' to have 'make' generate the final I'd like to add the 'source' parts of your Debian packaging effort to the Indic tree. Which files in the tarball are 'source' (i.e., used to generate the tarball)? Regards, Koshy <jk...@fr...> |