RE: [Indic-computing-standards] Re: [Indic-computing-users] Unicode
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jkoshy
From: Keyur S. <key...@ya...> - 2003-01-23 05:20:57
|
--- Andy White <And...@bt...> wrote: > If problems in Indic Unicode handling are not brought up on the Unicode > list, members of the Unicode consortium may never learn about them and > they may never be sorted. > > I have searched the Unicode list and it seems that Keyur Shroff has > *never* posted to any messages to it. For me it doesn't matter who explained the corrections first as far as my name is there ;-). Seriously, if Andy is very concious about his name then let me clarify that Andy originally suggested the corrections (in what is wrong with Indic Unicode-FAQ) and I tried to put it in other words because few people couldn't understand what Andy meant :) Andy, for your information, I posted a message to Yahoogroups! which is an archive of Unicode list. You can see my message at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/unicode/message/16352 I thought both the orginal Unicode list and this archive is same and message posted to this archive is also included in Unicode list. Somehow I started receving two messages from Unicode list. One from the original and the other from this egroup archive. So I unsubscribed from original Unicode list and I am still a member of Unicode group at Yahoo. If message posted to egroup archive are not received on Unicode list then I don't know where in the world my message was lost :) Also, I apologize for use of word "foreigner". I really meant "non-native" speaker. Regards, Keyur __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com |