Re: [Ikvm-developers] JBoss (was: IKVM on Mono on OS/X)

[Andrew C. O. <aco...@ap...>]

As soon as I get IKVM working with Hello World then I'll give it a whirl.
:-)  --  I'll try on my Linux box shortly.  No go on OS/X (with mono).

 I'll probably want to start with JB 3.2 as it will probably be easier to
get working (no JDK 1.4 dependencies) and move up to 4.0 from there.  4.0 i=
s
a pretty rapidly moving target and the startup time of 4.0 isn't all that
impressive.

One of our guys got 3.2 to start up and though it wasn't very fast, it was
far faster than Kaffe for sure!

-Andy
--=20
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI

http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?

> From: "Jeroen Frijters" <je...@su...>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:00:23 +0100
> To: "Andrew C. Oliver" <aco...@ap...>
> Cc: <ikv...@li...>
> Subject: Re: [Ikvm-developers] JBoss (was: IKVM on Mono on OS/X)
>=20
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>> I want to run JBoss on .NET and see if I can't get
>> certain things running on there (deployers, AOP stuff so
>> that you could write stuff in C# and yet get J2EE ala
>> carte services, maybe write services and aspects in C#
>> eventually, etc). I'm a little cracked I admit, but that=B9s
>> just the sort of thing that I enjoy ;-)
>=20
> I did some work on JBoss a while ago (version 4.0.0DR2) and fixed a coupl=
e of
> IKVM bugs because of it. It started up a lot of stuff, but at least some
> services failed because java.nio.* isn't implemented yet.
>=20
> You obviously know a lot more about than JBoss than me, so maybe you can =
get
> it to work with java.nio.* (or even better you can implement java.nio.* :=
-)).
> I must warn you though, that starting it up was awfully slow on IKVM.
>=20
> Regards,
> Jeroen