Re: [Ikvm-developers] Package.getImplementationVersion

[Jeroen F. <je...@su...>]

I don't know. I asked you to post a repro and so far I haven't seen anything.

Regards,
Jeroen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Pederson [mailto:er...@gm...]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 18:17
> To: Jeroen Frijters
> Cc: ikv...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Ikvm-developers] Package.getImplementationVersion
> 
> Hi Jeroen - I just wanted to follow up on this.  It looks like a bug?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> -- Eric
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Eric Pederson <er...@gm...
> <mailto:er...@gm...> > wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Hi Jeroen:
> 
> 	Per your instructions I created a small test case.   If I create a
> DLL with just the jar that has the class that I am calling
> getClass().getPackage().getImplementationVersion() on, then it works
> fine.  However, if the DLL is created with a number of jars, then it
> uses the information from the manifest of the first jar.  For example
> the DLL is created with:
> 
> 	ikvmc -target:library -out:MyLib.dll -version:3.2.1 -
> sharedclassloader jar1.jar jar2.jar jar3.jar
> 
> 	it will always use the information from the manifest of jar1.jar,
> even if the class in question is from jar2.jar.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 
> 
> 	-- Eric
> 
> 
> 
> 	On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Jeroen Frijters <je...@su...
> <mailto:je...@su...> > wrote:
> 
> 
> 		Hi Eric,
> 
> 		After you create the dll you can create an exe from a small
> Java class that prints the package info. Compile the test class like
> this:
> 
> 		ikvmc -out:test.exe Test.class -r:MyLibrary.dll
> 
> 		Regards,
> 		Jeroen
> 
> 
> 		> -----Original Message-----
> 		> From: Eric Pederson [mailto:er...@gm...
> <mailto:er...@gm...> ]
> 
> 		> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 19:10
> 		> To: Jeroen Frijters
> 		> Subject: Re: [Ikvm-developers]
> Package.getImplementationVersion
> 		>
> 		> Hi Jeroen:
> 		>
> 		> What's the best way to create a small repro?  I'm a Java
> guy and I don't
> 		> know the best way to do this.  The project that I'm working
> on is a
> 		> Excel .XLL addin.  I can create a small DLL based on a
> small jar using
> 		> ikvmc - how would I test that DLL?
> 		>
> 		> In the meantime, here's some more clues - the other
> package.getXXX
> 		> methods also return values that aren't the same as the
> manifest for the
> 		> jar that contains the class:
> 		>
> 		>
> 		> getImplementationVersion: 1.1
> 		>
> 		> getImplementationTitle: Sun Java System Application Server
> 		>
> 		> getImplementationVendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> 		>
> 		> getSpecificationVersion: 1.1
> 		>
> 		> getSpecificationTitle: JavaBeans(TM) Activation Framework
> Specification
> 		>
> 		> getSpecificationVendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> 		>
> 		>
> 		>
> 		>
> 		> Thanks!
> 		>
> 		>
> 		>
> 		> -- Eric
> 		>
> 		>
> 		>
> 		> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Jeroen Frijters
> <je...@su... <mailto:je...@su...>
> 
> 		> <mailto:je...@su... <mailto:je...@su...> > >
> wrote:
> 		>
> 		>
> 		>       Please post a (small) repro.
> 		>
> 		>
> 		>       > -----Original Message-----
> 		>       > From: Eric Pederson [mailto:er...@gm...
> <mailto:er...@gm...>
> 		> <mailto:er...@gm... <mailto:er...@gm...> > ]
> 		>       > Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:36
> 
> 		>       > To: ikv...@li...
> <mailto:ikv...@li...>  <mailto:ikvm-
> <mailto:ikvm->
> 		> dev...@li...
> <mailto:dev...@li...> >
> 		>       > Subject: [Ikvm-developers]
> Package.getImplementationVersion
> 		>       >
> 		>       > Hi all:
> 		>       >
> 		>       > this.getClass.getPackage.getImplementationVersion
> returns "1.1"
> 		> instead
> 		>       > of the string in the MANIFEST.MF using a DLL built
> with ikvmc
> 		>       > 7.2.4630.5.  I saw in mailing list post that 7.1
> should support
> 		> it.
> 		>       >
> 		>       > Please advise, thanks!
> 		>       >
> 		>       >
> 		>       > -- Eric
> 		>
> 		>
> 		>
> 
> 
> 
>