Re: [Ikvm-developers] Package.getImplementationVersion

[Eric P. <er...@gm...>]

Hi Jeroen - I just wanted to follow up on this.  It looks like a bug?

Thanks,


-- Eric


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Eric Pederson <er...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi Jeroen:
>
> Per your instructions I created a small test case.   If I create a DLL
> with just the jar that has the class that I am calling
> getClass().getPackage().getImplementationVersion() on, then it works fine.
>  However, if the DLL is created with a number of jars, then it uses the
> information from the manifest of the first jar.  For example the DLL is
> created with:
>
> ikvmc -target:library -out:MyLib.dll -version:3.2.1 -sharedclassloader
> jar1.jar jar2.jar jar3.jar
>
> it will always use the information from the manifest of jar1.jar, even if
> the class in question is from jar2.jar.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -- Eric
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Jeroen Frijters <je...@su...>wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> After you create the dll you can create an exe from a small Java class
>> that prints the package info. Compile the test class like this:
>>
>> ikvmc -out:test.exe Test.class -r:MyLibrary.dll
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jeroen
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Eric Pederson [mailto:er...@gm...]
>> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 19:10
>> > To: Jeroen Frijters
>> > Subject: Re: [Ikvm-developers] Package.getImplementationVersion
>> >
>> > Hi Jeroen:
>> >
>> > What's the best way to create a small repro?  I'm a Java guy and I don't
>> > know the best way to do this.  The project that I'm working on is a
>> > Excel .XLL addin.  I can create a small DLL based on a small jar using
>> > ikvmc - how would I test that DLL?
>> >
>> > In the meantime, here's some more clues - the other package.getXXX
>> > methods also return values that aren't the same as the manifest for the
>> > jar that contains the class:
>> >
>> >
>> > getImplementationVersion: 1.1
>> >
>> > getImplementationTitle: Sun Java System Application Server
>> >
>> > getImplementationVendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>> >
>> > getSpecificationVersion: 1.1
>> >
>> > getSpecificationTitle: JavaBeans(TM) Activation Framework Specification
>> >
>> > getSpecificationVendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Eric
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Jeroen Frijters <je...@su...
>> > <mailto:je...@su...> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >       Please post a (small) repro.
>> >
>> >
>> >       > -----Original Message-----
>> >       > From: Eric Pederson [mailto:er...@gm...
>> > <mailto:er...@gm...> ]
>> >       > Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:36
>> >       > To: ikv...@li... <mailto:ikvm-
>> > dev...@li...>
>> >       > Subject: [Ikvm-developers] Package.getImplementationVersion
>> >       >
>> >       > Hi all:
>> >       >
>> >       > this.getClass.getPackage.getImplementationVersion returns "1.1"
>> > instead
>> >       > of the string in the MANIFEST.MF using a DLL built with ikvmc
>> >       > 7.2.4630.5.  I saw in mailing list post that 7.1 should support
>> > it.
>> >       >
>> >       > Please advise, thanks!
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >       > -- Eric
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>