Re: [Ikvm-developers] Suggestion popups in visual studio with internal packages.

[Dawid W. <daw...@cs...>]

Hi Jeroen,

Yes, I checked all the things you mentioned -- that's why it's so
frustrating. Let me send you the problematic assembly off the list.

Dawid

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Jeroen Frijters <je...@su...> wrote:
> Hi Dawid,
>
> I have to ask the obvious question first, are you sure the assembly doesn't have an InternalsVisibleToAttribute for the assembly that you're editing in Visual Studio (or possibly an InternalsVisibletoAttribute that VS might misinterpret).
>
> AFIAK, that's the only mechanism that allows non-public classes to be visible.
>
> Also, it could be a simple Visual Studio caching bug, if you've only recently made the change. It wouldn't surprise me if the Intellisense stuff is cached somewhere in a database in the solution.
>
> If you use one of these non-public classes and then build do you get the expected compile error?
>
> Regards,
> Jeroen
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dawid Weiss [mailto:daw...@cs...]
>> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 09:02
>> To: ikvm-developers
>> Subject: [Ikvm-developers] Suggestion popups in visual studio with
>> internal packages.
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have a task to investigate but I thought maybe somebody already has a
>> solution/ answer to this. The problem we have is this:
>>
>> 1) we compile a Java JAR with ikvmc, making a single package public
>> (using ikvmc publicpackage directive).
>> 2) everything works fine, classes in other packages are marked internal,
>> 3) visual studio still _does_ come up with a suggestion drop list when
>> typing in the "internal" namespaces even if there's nothing public in
>> them (and once you get to the package level where classes reside the
>> combo is empty).
>>
>> Visual Studio 2010, didn't check any other versions. This does not
>> happen with C# assemblies as far as I can tell. More: this also doesn't
>> happen on simple Java examples (when I tried to isolate the problem).
>> Are there any special attributes or namespace data you can think of that
>> may be causing this? I'll dig, but wanted to make sure I'm not
>> duplicating work.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dawid
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
>> valuable.
>> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
>> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data
>> and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ikvm-developers mailing list
>> Ikv...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ikvm-developers
>
>