Menu
▾
▴
ids-devel — IDS developers use this list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(42) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
|
From: Chris S. <chr...@ya...> - 2003-08-12 14:09:08
|
> But as I didn't really get many replies of interest, > I just didn't do it yet. > I preferred to deal with the ones who emailed me in > private directly and give them my entire code > and help them making the few configuration > modifications. :) Please don't take a lack of email replies on the list as a lack of interest. Most people aren't going to send "me too" emails, even if they'd like the changes you've made. Also, there are many people who might appreciate your changes being incorporated into the core IDS who aren't on this list, but will download upgrades to IDS and enjoy your new features. > As I said in my first post, some of my modifications > might not be of everyones interests, > so I was more waiting for feedback / requests of > what could/should be ported into the main stream. Post the bug fixes for sure. Also post the pretty URL fix. Those are the ones I'm most interested in seeing. Chris __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com |
|
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2003-08-12 09:41:37
|
timduru wrote:
>So what should I do ? make a huge diff on my version after including the 0.82 modifications ?
>Make one diff for all the small changes / bug fixes
>and another one for the pretty url modifications ? (as that last one is the modification that generates the most changes , might be better to have it separate ? )
>
>or try to make one diff for every single change ?
>(might not be the easiest to integrate though, as diff after diff it'd get more and more difficult to merge as the code would change ? )
>
Bug fixes and the such can be done in one diff file. I will revise
them and go from there. Keep in mind that some might have also made it
into 0.83b2, so it's a good idea checking that code base as well.
Enhancements should be submitted one at a time.
>Do you still have the original ids-0.81.tgz btw ? I don't see it in the download area..
>that way I could make a diff between 0.81 and 0.82 and include that in my version so I'm up to date with 0.82 to make the diffs on my modifications.
>
I'm made 0.81 active so you can download it.
--
H| I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
|
|
From: timduru <ti...@ti...> - 2003-08-12 08:41:59
|
> If you want your stuff integrated into the main stream > application, > you need to supply diffs of what you're doing. Not everyone knows how > to edit those files, and not everyone has the guts to even touch stuff > they don't quite understand. Diffs are a lot easier to apply for a > lot of people, and will also make live for us developers a lot easier. yes, but I thought juste replacing the function would be easier and more useable by JM Ulrich instead of having a diff that might fail. Replacing the entire function by hand seemed safer to me until I upgrade to 0.82 and make clean patches.. But JM found even a better solution :o) > It doesn't matter what version you've "patched" up, current or > old, > it can always be back (or fore) ported if needed, but you need to get > used to submitting diffs instead. Ok, well that's what I said in my first post, that if there was interest in some / all of the modifications that I would take the time to isolate most of them and make clean patches. But as I didn't really get many replies of interest, I just didn't do it yet. I preferred to deal with the ones who emailed me in private directly and give them my entire code and help them making the few configuration modifications. :) As I said in my first post, some of my modifications might not be of everyones interests, so I was more waiting for feedback / requests of what could/should be ported into the main stream. So what should I do ? make a huge diff on my version after including the 0.82 modifications ? Make one diff for all the small changes / bug fixes and another one for the pretty url modifications ? (as that last one is the modification that generates the most changes , might be better to have it separate ? ) or try to make one diff for every single change ? (might not be the easiest to integrate though, as diff after diff it'd get more and more difficult to merge as the code would change ? ) I'm not sure what you or others would prefer, what would be easier etc... Also Is there a way to make the diffs so that if applying one diff after the other it doesn't fail because the first diff have already modified the same file / code portion ? Do you still have the original ids-0.81.tgz btw ? I don't see it in the download area.. that way I could make a diff between 0.81 and 0.82 and include that in my version so I'm up to date with 0.82 to make the diffs on my modifications. thanks |
|
From: timduru <ti...@ti...> - 2003-08-12 08:17:43
|
Techwolf <Tec...@at...> wrote: > Major problem with that. e-mail wraps at 72, what wrap did you set > yours? This could very well hose the system because of different > formating systems between editors. well I sent it as an attachment in a text file, If it wraps in the email you see it's because your email client is embedding the .txt attachment in the email then wrapping it. The best would be to save the attached text file then open it. > > Sorry but I'm just too busy for the moment with other things to go > > more in details and put back the overlay / do the patch against > > 0.82, test against 0.82 and look more in details... > > > As soon I figure out what command to pass to Imagic, I can post a diff > here. I'm sure I am not the only one that has this major bug that > makes thumbnails 30-50K apiece. well Jean-Marc Ulrich solution is much better than mine. I've attached the diff for his solution against 0.82 with this email. My changes included a few more things, but I'll post another diff later on including these, after I've moved to 0.82. that way it'd be easier. |
|
From: Techwolf <Tec...@at...> - 2003-08-12 06:40:01
|
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:47, timduru wrote: > > well it's not a patch it's called copy-paste ;) > just open the idsShared.pm with your favorite text editor > and replace the entire createDisplayImage function > Major problem with that. e-mail wraps at 72, what wrap did you set yours? This could very well hose the system because of different formating systems between editors. > > Sorry but I'm just too busy for the moment with other things to go more in details and put back the overlay / do the patch against 0.82, test against 0.82 and look more in details... > As soon I figure out what command to pass to Imagic, I can post a diff here. I'm sure I am not the only one that has this major bug that makes thumbnails 30-50K apiece. > I don't think 0.82 modified something in the createDisplayImage function compared to the 0.81 version I'm using > but just in case backup your original idsShared.pm file. ;) Doesn't matter, a diff you can see what is changed and can easily port it to later versions. I do this all the time with my custom redhat spec kernel builds that I add ACPI, Omnibook, and other patches along with redhat 1000+ patches. -- Techwolf Tec...@at... http://www.techwolf.net/index.html PGP public keys on web site. <html> <form> <input type signature> </form> </html> |
|
From: Techwolf <Tec...@at...> - 2003-08-12 05:25:32
|
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:24, Jean-Marc Ulrich wrote: > Hello !! > I solved the problem now alone with a builtin function of Image:Magick: > > I added in the function createDisplayImage at Line 606 to lines an then it > locks like this: > > > This change removes the EXIF and other infos in all rescaled images (thumbs > and all pics not in original size). This was exactly what I wanted. > See here: > http://www.ulrichs.ch/ids/index.cgi?mode=album&album=./Night%20in%20Bern > > I found it here: http://www.imagemagick.org/www/convert.html#exam > > Greetings > > Jean-Marc > What file was changed? And what diff program did you use? I can't see the changes in it. -- Techwolf Tec...@at... http://www.techwolf.net/index.html PGP public keys on web site. <html> <form> <input type signature> </form> </html> |
|
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2003-08-11 22:38:44
|
timduru wrote:
>well it's not a patch it's called copy-paste ;)
>just open the idsShared.pm with your favorite text editor
>and replace the entire createDisplayImage function
>
>
If you want your stuff integrated into the main stream application,
you need to supply diffs of what you're doing. Not everyone knows how
to edit those files, and not everyone has the guts to even touch stuff
they don't quite understand. Diffs are a lot easier to apply for a lot
of people, and will also make live for us developers a lot easier.
It doesn't matter what version you've "patched" up, current or old,
it can always be back (or fore) ported if needed, but you need to get
used to submitting diffs instead.
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
|
|
From: timduru <ti...@ti...> - 2003-08-11 21:47:46
|
> On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 08:03, timduru wrote: > > > > I modified the createDisplayImage method > > What I do is first create a blank image with no EXIF then copy the current image data into that one. > > Maybe there another solution with imageMagick I'm not really an expert with it .. ;) > > > > I've attached the new version with this message. > > It also removes the overlay icon on the thumb if I remember well as I didn't really need it, > > if you want it back you'll have to uncomment some of the lines. > > > > Can you re-post that as a diff -u? I don't know what diff program you > used there as I can't use that type of patch. well it's not a patch it's called copy-paste ;) just open the idsShared.pm with your favorite text editor and replace the entire createDisplayImage function Sorry but I'm just too busy for the moment with other things to go more in details and put back the overlay / do the patch against 0.82, test against 0.82 and look more in details... I don't think 0.82 modified something in the createDisplayImage function compared to the 0.81 version I'm using but just in case backup your original idsShared.pm file. ;) |
|
From: Jean-Marc U. <uj...@gm...> - 2003-08-11 21:24:45
|
Hello !!
I solved the problem now alone with a builtin function of Image:Magick:
I added in the function createDisplayImage at Line 606 to lines an then it
locks like this:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
$x = $imageToScale->Border(color=>'black',width=>$scaledImageBorderWidth,
height=>$scaledImageBorderWidth);
die "$x" if "$x";
$x = $imageToScale->Profile("*");
die "$x" if "$x";
if (($displayScaledIcon) eq 'y' && ($maxDimension eq
$previewMaxDimension)) {
my($overlayXSize, $overlayYSize) = $scaledOverlay->Get('width',
'height');
$imageToScale->Composite(image=>$scaledOverlay,compose=>'over',geometry=>("+
".($displayX - ($overlayXSize + $scaledImageBorderWidth))."+".($displayY -
($overlayYSize + $scaledImageBorderWidth)))); #overlay the scaled icon
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
This change removes the EXIF and other infos in all rescaled images (thumbs
and all pics not in original size). This was exactly what I wanted.
See here:
http://www.ulrichs.ch/ids/index.cgi?mode=album&album=./Night%20in%20Bern
I found it here: http://www.imagemagick.org/www/convert.html#exam
Greetings
Jean-Marc
|
|
From: Techwolf <Tec...@at...> - 2003-08-11 17:59:49
|
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 08:03, timduru wrote: > > I modified the createDisplayImage method > What I do is first create a blank image with no EXIF then copy the current image data into that one. > Maybe there another solution with imageMagick I'm not really an expert with it .. ;) > > I've attached the new version with this message. > It also removes the overlay icon on the thumb if I remember well as I didn't really need it, > if you want it back you'll have to uncomment some of the lines. > Can you re-post that as a diff -u? I don't know what diff program you used there as I can't use that type of patch. Also, the "+" overlay on the thumbs can be turned off in the settings, no patch is needed. -- Techwolf Tec...@at... http://www.techwolf.net/index.html PGP public keys on web site. <html> <form> <input type signature> </form> </html> |
|
From: timduru <ti...@ti...> - 2003-08-11 13:07:48
|
> My problem wirh IDS ist this one: > > > + exif problem, when an image had exif info into it, the thumbnail > > was > including the exif data and so making it like 30KB too big. (that one > was really making dialup user yell ;o) ) > > How do you changed it ? I think it was not so difficult ! > > Thanks a lot ! I modified the createDisplayImage method What I do is first create a blank image with no EXIF then copy the current image data into that one. Maybe there another solution with imageMagick I'm not really an expert with it .. ;) I've attached the new version with this message. It also removes the overlay icon on the thumb if I remember well as I didn't really need it, if you want it back you'll have to uncomment some of the lines. let me know if it works for you.. thanks |
|
From: Brian Y. <br...@sp...> - 2003-08-08 21:56:37
|
> Note that IDS does not create an album_ICON.txt file anywhere. the > _icon file is a PNG image. The file you want is album_IMAGE.txt. So, > when you try the above line (as _image, not _icon,) and delete the .png > files, does it recreate the icons after re-running preview-maker.pl? That works, even without re-running previewmaker.pl. Thanks for catching that; time for the weekend. > >Any idea why the icon wasn't being randomly generated in the first > >place? > What's the contents of the _image.txt file if you let IDS attempt to > create it automatically? Not created. If I remove my hand-make _image.txt file and run previewmaker.pl, all of the png icons are removed. Only after re-creating the _image.txt file do the icons get created (by previewmaker.pl). If I hit the 'random icon' link under the admin page, _image.txt and *.album_icon.png are removed. previewmaker.pl does not re-create these. > Also, an EOL is different than a CR/LF - one just indicated the end > of line, which is fine. The other adds a carrier return and line feed, > and that's not fine for IDS. All editing is being done under linux, so eol=cr, not cr/lf. I just had the file names mixed up apparently.. -Brian -- Brian Youngstrom br...@sp... |
|
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2003-08-08 21:27:26
|
Brian Youngstrom wrote: > I've snagged the icon that I am seeing and stored it at > http://wlkerboh.mine.nu/~briany/broken-album_icon.png . There is > definitely something other than the standard grey on the back two > layers. Borders are also white, not grey. That's not the Grove icon. That's the one that resides in /site-images/album_icon.png. This happens when IDS doesn't have any image to display, which concurs with your assessment of it not picking up an image for the thumbnail. > 'echo -n /Denmark/Copenhagen_Beginning/100_0470.JPG > > Denmark/album_icon.txt' Note that IDS does not create an album_ICON.txt file anywhere. the _icon file is a PNG image. The file you want is album_IMAGE.txt. So, when you try the above line (as _image, not _icon,) and delete the .png files, does it recreate the icons after re-running preview-maker.pl? > Any idea why the icon wasn't being randomly generated in the first > place? What's the contents of the _image.txt file if you let IDS attempt to create it automatically? Also, an EOL is different than a CR/LF - one just indicated the end of line, which is fine. The other adds a carrier return and line feed, and that's not fine for IDS. -- W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |
|
From: Brian Y. <br...@sp...> - 2003-08-08 20:59:56
|
> There are no layers to those icons. If you look in themes/[your > theme]/images/ you'll find all the icons used. The only part of the > albumicon.png file that ever gets updated is the white square. The rest > doesn't get touched at all. I've snagged the icon that I am seeing and stored it at http://wlkerboh.mine.nu/~briany/broken-album_icon.png . There is definitely something other than the standard grey on the back two layers. Borders are also white, not grey. > Apache might not be able to read the physical symlink. It can read > what's within it (the other albums), but not the symlink itself to > figure out what icon to use. briany@alobar:/home/httpd/htdocs/ids$ ll [...] drwxrwxr-x 3 briany users 4096 Mar 26 10:05 admin/ drwxrwxrwt 12 apache apache 4096 Jul 17 18:30 album-data/ drwxrwxr-x 3 briany apache 4096 Jul 17 18:28 albums/ -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 750 Apr 3 12:23 ids.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 briany users 39430 Mar 24 20:02 idsShared.pm briany@alobar:/home/httpd/htdocs/ids$ ll albums/ total 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 briany users 19 May 12 21:11 Brians_shots -> /pics/Brians\ shots// lrwxrwxrwx 1 briany users 14 Jul 17 18:28 Denmark -> /pics/Denmark// lrwxrwxrwx 1 briany users 19 Jun 21 16:14 Fremont_Solstice_Parade_2003 -> /pics/Fremont\ 2003// lrwxrwxrwx 1 briany users 16 May 12 21:11 New_Years -> /pics/New\ Years// lrwxrwxrwx 1 briany users 23 May 23 17:35 Seattle_Aquarium -> /pics/Seattle\ Aquarium// drwxr-xr-x 2 briany users 4096 Mar 24 20:02 Stephan/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 briany users 23 May 12 21:11 Vancouver_Mar-03 -> /pics/Vancouver\ Mar-03// lrwxrwxrwx 1 briany users 24 May 25 17:12 Woodland_Park_Zoo -> /pics/Woodland\ Park\ Zoo// briany@alobar:/home/httpd/htdocs/ids$ ll /pics [...] drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 27 17:28 Brians\ shots/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:28 Denmark/ [...] briany@alobar:/home/httpd/htdocs/ids/albums/Denmark$ ll total 36 drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:13 Copenhagen_Beginning/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:28 Copenhagen_Ending/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:19 Legoland/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:21 Malmo/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 20:50 Odense/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:22 Roskilde/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:24 Slagelse/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 20:50 Stockholm/ drwxrwxr-x 1 briany users 4096 Jul 17 18:25 wedding/ > Also, you mentioned something about the _icon.txt file. Keep in > mind that it's a single line of text, without a CR/LF at the end. > Having a CR/LF in the file will result in it being ignored all together. Even though vim doesn't appear to think there is a EOL there, wc sees it: $ wc Denmark/album_image.txt Denmark/Malmo/album_image.txt 1 1 43 Denmark/album_image.txt 0 1 27 Denmark/Malmo/album_image.txt So that explains why the icon entered manually doesn't work. I swear that there is no second line in vim when I edit the file. Only the space filling ~ appear below the line. (Maybe this is vim being too smart for me...) Even doing a 'echo -n /Denmark/Copenhagen_Beginning/100_0470.JPG > Denmark/album_icon.txt' results in an EOL in the file. Any idea why the icon wasn't being randomly generated in the first place? Any plans to create an entry in the admin pages to allow one to 'use this for top album icon'? -- Brian Youngstrom br...@sp... Seize the day, put no trust in the morrow! -- Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horace) |
|
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2003-08-08 20:36:04
|
Brian Youngstrom wrote:
>One thing that I noticed that may help is when I didn't have an
>_icon.txt file, the picture icon in the top-level album had all three
>levels blank (Grove theme). After adding the _icon.txt file, the back
>two layers of the icon seemed to have something, but nothing on the top
>layer.
>
There are no layers to those icons. If you look in themes/[your
theme]/images/ you'll find all the icons used. The only part of the
albumicon.png file that ever gets updated is the white square. The rest
doesn't get touched at all.
>Gentoo, apache2, perl 5.8.0, ImageMagick/PerlMagick 5.5.7. No suexec.
>FollowSymLinks used everywhere. Images smb mounted 775.
>
>
Apache might not be able to read the physical symlink. It can read
what's within it (the other albums), but not the symlink itself to
figure out what icon to use.
Also, you mentioned something about the _icon.txt file. Keep in
mind that it's a single line of text, without a CR/LF at the end.
Having a CR/LF in the file will result in it being ignored all together.
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
|
|
From: Brian Y. <br...@sp...> - 2003-08-08 20:25:34
|
Only the directories in .../albums/ are symlinks, everything else is a real file (on a smb mount). All works well with the exception of the album icon. Made progress on the icon however. Seems I can't create the album_icon.txt by hand. I copied one from a sub-album, works great. Edit the file by hand, change doesn't take effect, even after running previewmaker.pl. Old icon remains. (Then again..removed Grove.album_icon.png, problem returns). One thing that I noticed that may help is when I didn't have an _icon.txt file, the picture icon in the top-level album had all three levels blank (Grove theme). After adding the _icon.txt file, the back two layers of the icon seemed to have something, but nothing on the top layer. Album is at http://wlkerboh.mine.nu/ids/index.cgi (Denmark is the troubled album). Gentoo, apache2, perl 5.8.0, ImageMagick/PerlMagick 5.5.7. No suexec. FollowSymLinks used everywhere. Images smb mounted 775. -Brian On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:31:54PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > Before I rip code to shreds, there are a few things I want to figure out. For > Apache to handle symlinks, you need to tell it to FollowSymLinks in the config > file. Has anyone tried and see if this is set in the config file? Does Apache > actually have the proper permissions to read the symlink itself? Usually when > you symlink from one location to another, it tends to have your permissions, as > opposed to the apache's process. This may cause trouble: > > drwxr-xr-x apache apache albums/album1 > lrwxrwxrwx root root albums/album2 -> /storage/album2 > > Even if the stuff under /storage/album2 is owned apache.apache, it may still > cause trouble not being able to read the symlink. This is an untested theory of > course, but it would be interedting to see if that's really the case or not. > > Also, it could very well be something within apache2 that's cause the problem. > I run symlinks under apache 1.3.x and have no problems at all. I have no > intention of going to apache2 anytime in the near future due to it's current > state, and the fact that PHP can not work with it (yes, I'm ont of those.) > > I look forward to hearing some comments, or test results. > > -- > R | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. > +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 > IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130 > Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6 > http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > IDS-devel mailing list > IDS...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > -- Brian Youngstrom br...@sp... Steele's Law: There exist tasks which cannot be done by more than ten men or fewer than one hundred. |
|
From: Mike R. <mi...@mi...> - 2003-08-08 01:55:23
|
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > Before I rip code to shreds, there are a few things I want to figure out. For > Apache to handle symlinks, you need to tell it to FollowSymLinks in the config > file. Has anyone tried and see if this is set in the config file? Does Apache > actually have the proper permissions to read the symlink itself? Usually when > you symlink from one location to another, it tends to have your permissions, as > opposed to the apache's process. This may cause trouble: I doublechecked, and my config does allow for symlinks (suse 8.2, apache 2.0). Another proof is that the images in thy symlinked albums display; only the album thumb fails. example: http://www.riverside-cafe.com/index.cgi?mode=album&album=./Travel |
|
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2003-08-08 01:31:56
|
Before I rip code to shreds, there are a few things I want to figure out. For Apache to handle symlinks, you need to tell it to FollowSymLinks in the config file. Has anyone tried and see if this is set in the config file? Does Apache actually have the proper permissions to read the symlink itself? Usually when you symlink from one location to another, it tends to have your permissions, as opposed to the apache's process. This may cause trouble: drwxr-xr-x apache apache albums/album1 lrwxrwxrwx root root albums/album2 -> /storage/album2 Even if the stuff under /storage/album2 is owned apache.apache, it may still cause trouble not being able to read the symlink. This is an untested theory of course, but it would be interedting to see if that's really the case or not. Also, it could very well be something within apache2 that's cause the problem. I run symlinks under apache 1.3.x and have no problems at all. I have no intention of going to apache2 anytime in the near future due to it's current state, and the fact that PHP can not work with it (yes, I'm ont of those.) I look forward to hearing some comments, or test results. -- R | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |
|
From: Chris S. <chr...@ya...> - 2003-08-07 23:38:02
|
I'm also running Apache 2.0 on RedHat9 and don't have this problem. Chris --- Brian Youngstrom <br...@sp...> wrote: > Maybe we have something here. I'm also running > apache2, although on > Gentoo. Not sure why that would change the > behaviour of a cgi though... > > -Brian > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:39:31PM -0700, Curtis > Bray wrote: > > I just started noticing this same problem on my > installation. All my > > albums are symlinks. As an expierement I just > created a non-symlink > > album and now I see the album icon for the top > level container. Strange > > since this used to work - until I upgraded from > Redhat 7 to 9 (which > > upgraded from Apache 1.3 to 2.x and updated MANY > other things too). > > > > Curtis > > http://www.brayfamily.com > > > > Chris Shaffer wrote: > > > > >I also have albums within albums with no > problems. > > >Pictures from the sub-albums filter up to the > master > > >album and can be selected randomly or by choice. > All > > >albums are local, with no symlinks. > > > > > >Chris > > > > > >--- Brian Youngstrom <br...@sp...> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >>No, all directories involved are real > directories. > > >>The albums directory > > >>is a symlink to a smb share with all of the > > >>pictures. Each directory > > >>under there is real. All local ids information > > >>(album-data, etc) live > > >>on ext3 local to the webserver. > > >> > > >>-Brian > > >> > > >>On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 07:41:25PM -0400, Jeff > > >>Macdonald wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>Are these subdirs actually symlinks? > > >>> > > >>>On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:22, Brian Youngstrom > > >>> > > >>> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>what version of IDS ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>0.82 > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>Did you try to go to admin mode and click on > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>random icon to see if it > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>picks one from the subdirectories ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>I did. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>-- > > >>>Jeff Macdonald > <jef...@vi...> > > >>>My birding blog: > > >>> > > >>> > > > >http://www.virtualbuilder.com/archives/cat_birding.html > > > > > > > > >>>Into birding? Visit http://www.migratus.com > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >>-- > > >>Brian Youngstrom > > >>br...@sp... > > >>HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN > DAY: > > >>#1040 Your income tax refund cheque bounces. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > >>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built > > >>ASP.NET sites including > > >>Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums > are > > >>available now. > > >>Download today and enter to win an XBOX or > Visual > > >>Studio .NET. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > > > > > > > >>_______________________________________________ > > >>IDS-devel mailing list > > >>IDS...@li... > > > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > > >> > > >> > > > > > >__________________________________ > > >Do you Yahoo!? > > >Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site > design software > > >http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > > >This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built > ASP.NET sites including > > >Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > > >Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > Studio .NET. > > > >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > >_______________________________________________ > > >IDS-devel mailing list > > >IDS...@li... > > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built > ASP.NET sites including > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > Studio .NET. > > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > IDS-devel mailing list > > IDS...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > > > > -- > > -- > Brian Youngstrom > br...@sp... > Don't get suckered in by the comments -- they can be > terribly misleading. Debug only code. -- Dave Storer > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built > ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > IDS-devel mailing list > IDS...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com |
|
From: Brian Y. <br...@sp...> - 2003-08-07 19:57:14
|
Maybe we have something here. I'm also running apache2, although on Gentoo. Not sure why that would change the behaviour of a cgi though... -Brian On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:39:31PM -0700, Curtis Bray wrote: > I just started noticing this same problem on my installation. All my > albums are symlinks. As an expierement I just created a non-symlink > album and now I see the album icon for the top level container. Strange > since this used to work - until I upgraded from Redhat 7 to 9 (which > upgraded from Apache 1.3 to 2.x and updated MANY other things too). > > Curtis > http://www.brayfamily.com > > Chris Shaffer wrote: > > >I also have albums within albums with no problems. > >Pictures from the sub-albums filter up to the master > >album and can be selected randomly or by choice. All > >albums are local, with no symlinks. > > > >Chris > > > >--- Brian Youngstrom <br...@sp...> wrote: > > > > > >>No, all directories involved are real directories. > >>The albums directory > >>is a symlink to a smb share with all of the > >>pictures. Each directory > >>under there is real. All local ids information > >>(album-data, etc) live > >>on ext3 local to the webserver. > >> > >>-Brian > >> > >>On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 07:41:25PM -0400, Jeff > >>Macdonald wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Are these subdirs actually symlinks? > >>> > >>>On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:22, Brian Youngstrom > >>> > >>> > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>>what version of IDS ? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>0.82 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Did you try to go to admin mode and click on > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>random icon to see if it > >> > >> > >>>>>picks one from the subdirectories ? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>I did. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>-- > >>>Jeff Macdonald <jef...@vi...> > >>>My birding blog: > >>> > >>> > >http://www.virtualbuilder.com/archives/cat_birding.html > > > > > >>>Into birding? Visit http://www.migratus.com > >>> > >>> > >> > >>-- > >>Brian Youngstrom > >>br...@sp... > >>HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY: > >>#1040 Your income tax refund cheque bounces. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built > >>ASP.NET sites including > >>Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > >>available now. > >>Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > >>Studio .NET. > >> > >> > >> > >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > > > > >>_______________________________________________ > >>IDS-devel mailing list > >>IDS...@li... > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > >> > >> > > > >__________________________________ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > >http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > >Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > >Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > >_______________________________________________ > >IDS-devel mailing list > >IDS...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > IDS-devel mailing list > IDS...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > -- -- Brian Youngstrom br...@sp... Don't get suckered in by the comments -- they can be terribly misleading. Debug only code. -- Dave Storer |
|
From: Jean-Marc U. <uj...@gm...> - 2003-08-05 20:49:44
|
Hello
My problem wirh IDS ist this one:
> + exif problem, when an image had exif info into it, the thumbnail was
including the exif data and so making it like 30KB too big. (that one was
really making dialup user yell ;o) )
How do you changed it ? I think it was not so difficult !
Thanks a lot !
Jean-Marc
http://www.ulrichs.ch
|
|
From: Curtis B. <cu...@br...> - 2003-08-01 22:39:34
|
I just started noticing this same problem on my installation. All my
albums are symlinks. As an expierement I just created a non-symlink
album and now I see the album icon for the top level container. Strange
since this used to work - until I upgraded from Redhat 7 to 9 (which
upgraded from Apache 1.3 to 2.x and updated MANY other things too).
Curtis
http://www.brayfamily.com
Chris Shaffer wrote:
>I also have albums within albums with no problems.
>Pictures from the sub-albums filter up to the master
>album and can be selected randomly or by choice. All
>albums are local, with no symlinks.
>
>Chris
>
>--- Brian Youngstrom <br...@sp...> wrote:
>
>
>>No, all directories involved are real directories.
>>The albums directory
>>is a symlink to a smb share with all of the
>>pictures. Each directory
>>under there is real. All local ids information
>>(album-data, etc) live
>>on ext3 local to the webserver.
>>
>>-Brian
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 07:41:25PM -0400, Jeff
>>Macdonald wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Are these subdirs actually symlinks?
>>>
>>>On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:22, Brian Youngstrom
>>>
>>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>what version of IDS ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>0.82
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Did you try to go to admin mode and click on
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>random icon to see if it
>>
>>
>>>>>picks one from the subdirectories ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>I did.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Jeff Macdonald <jef...@vi...>
>>>My birding blog:
>>>
>>>
>http://www.virtualbuilder.com/archives/cat_birding.html
>
>
>>>Into birding? Visit http://www.migratus.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Brian Youngstrom
>>br...@sp...
>>HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY:
>>#1040 Your income tax refund cheque bounces.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built
>>ASP.NET sites including
>>Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are
>>available now.
>>Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual
>>Studio .NET.
>>
>>
>>
>http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
>
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IDS-devel mailing list
>>IDS...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel
>>
>>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
>http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
>Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
>Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
>http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
>_______________________________________________
>IDS-devel mailing list
>IDS...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel
>
>
|
|
From: Chris S. <chr...@ya...> - 2003-07-31 23:56:26
|
I also have albums within albums with no problems. Pictures from the sub-albums filter up to the master album and can be selected randomly or by choice. All albums are local, with no symlinks. Chris --- Brian Youngstrom <br...@sp...> wrote: > No, all directories involved are real directories. > The albums directory > is a symlink to a smb share with all of the > pictures. Each directory > under there is real. All local ids information > (album-data, etc) live > on ext3 local to the webserver. > > -Brian > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 07:41:25PM -0400, Jeff > Macdonald wrote: > > Are these subdirs actually symlinks? > > > > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:22, Brian Youngstrom > wrote: > > > > what version of IDS ? > > > > > > 0.82 > > > > > > > Did you try to go to admin mode and click on > random icon to see if it > > > > picks one from the subdirectories ? > > > > > > I did. > > -- > > Jeff Macdonald <jef...@vi...> > > My birding blog: > http://www.virtualbuilder.com/archives/cat_birding.html > > Into birding? Visit http://www.migratus.com > > > > -- > Brian Youngstrom > br...@sp... > HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY: > #1040 Your income tax refund cheque bounces. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built > ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > IDS-devel mailing list > IDS...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com |
|
From: Brian Y. <br...@sp...> - 2003-07-31 21:38:17
|
No, all directories involved are real directories. The albums directory is a symlink to a smb share with all of the pictures. Each directory under there is real. All local ids information (album-data, etc) live on ext3 local to the webserver. -Brian On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 07:41:25PM -0400, Jeff Macdonald wrote: > Are these subdirs actually symlinks? > > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:22, Brian Youngstrom wrote: > > > what version of IDS ? > > > > 0.82 > > > > > Did you try to go to admin mode and click on random icon to see if it > > > picks one from the subdirectories ? > > > > I did. > -- > Jeff Macdonald <jef...@vi...> > My birding blog: http://www.virtualbuilder.com/archives/cat_birding.html > Into birding? Visit http://www.migratus.com -- Brian Youngstrom br...@sp... HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY: #1040 Your income tax refund cheque bounces. |
|
From: Jeff M. <jef...@vi...> - 2003-07-30 23:41:53
|
Are these subdirs actually symlinks? On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:22, Brian Youngstrom wrote: > > what version of IDS ?=20 >=20 > 0.82 >=20 > > Did you try to go to admin mode and click on random icon to see if it > > picks one from the subdirectories ?=20 >=20 > I did. --=20 Jeff Macdonald <jef...@vi...> My birding blog: http://www.virtualbuilder.com/archives/cat_birding.html Into birding? Visit http://www.migratus.com |
7 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
