From: Markus S. <mar...@gm...> - 2012-04-07 04:00:41
|
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Markus Scherer <mar...@gm...> wrote: > I think that in all other places of the preliminary API proposal "ordinal" > is fine and unambiguous, but for the MessageFormat syntax we will need to > find a different type name. > > So what would work? > - pl_ordinal? > - ordinal_pl? > - plural_ordinal? > - plural_ord? > - other? > Currently, the argument type name must only contain [a-zA-Z], no underscore. Either we find a name of only ASCII letters (probably best) or we allow whatever else we want. markus |