Re: [icu-design] C++ real RTTI instead of "poor man's RTTI"?

[<sr...@ic...>]

this makes AIX pass:

Index: source/config/mh-aix-va
===================================================================
--- source/config/mh-aix-va     (revision 28036)
+++ source/config/mh-aix-va     (working copy)
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 #           This helps in the data library,
 # -qproto assumes all functions are prototyped (for optimization)
 CFLAGS += -qproto -qroconst
-CXXFLAGS += -qproto -qroconst
+CXXFLAGS += -qproto -qroconst -qrtti

 # If you readd this line, you must change the SO value
 #LDFLAGS += -brtl



> Markus,
>  Thanks for being patient. Jason and, finally, I have tested I and Z
> (respectively).  It looks like these platforms, **with the compiler
> options and levels that ICU currently builds with** function properly
> with respect to RTTI.
>
>  So, it seems that the only remaining issue is (at least) -qrtti for AIX,
> and an intltest verification that RTTI is working. Using autoconf would
> be nice, but isn't urgent.
>
>  I think you could just add -qrtti  to CXXFLAGS in mh-aix-va
>
> -s
>
>> Thanks for testing!
>> Any problems on any other platforms?
>>
>> markus
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> icu-design mailing list
> icu...@li...
> To Un/Subscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icu-design
>