Re: [Iamb-dev-internal] streed
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
rbowen
From: Matt C. <su...@qx...> - 2001-04-01 16:43:23
|
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Rich Bowen wrote: > Is this DBI's fault, or the particular DBD that we happen to be using? > Would another database alleviate this problem? (I seem to recall that > this is DBI, but I was not sure.) its a dbi problem. another symptom of this is that the dbi engine can only handle one statement at a time. its not a database limitation, obviously, but a flaw in the core of dbi. solutions we've kicked around are rewriting dbi (do i really look that high?) and a proxy to dbi (what i've just proposed here). when perl6 comes out and threading is the default, dbi will have to be totally rewritten to properly support threading, at which time this limitation between poe and dbi will go away. > But, yes, it would be pretty cool to have a dbi cache thingy that you > send data to, and it queues up inserts/updates for later processing. > This could be a very cool thing just of itself - that is, completely > apart from IAMB. yeah. esp for some other more adequately funded projects :) i'm going to write a very iamb specific model and then ponder generalizing it for other fun and evil purposes. m. |