From: <bo...@bo...> - 2007-04-22 19:17:35
|
> Hi Bjorn, Hi, Doug. [...] > James Birchfield had mentioned on the sigar-users list that he was > exposing sigar data via JMX, but we haven't seen those classes. I didn't find too much hints to JMX usage on the list either, but I'll give it another try on the user list. Just to be sure :-) > So, no > there isn't anything I'm aware of beyond the existing sigar.jmx > package. We use HQ to monitor everything, where the plugins within the > agent are using the sigar API directly. However, I think it'd be great > to have a complete JMX sigar implementation, looks like you're on the > right track! > > There is one catch, due to the platforms we support, sigar is still > expected to compile with the 1.3 JDK (for AIX 4.3). We can get around > that, but we'd still need to maintain compatibility with the 1.4 JDK at > least. I see no problem there, as JMX 1.2 runs on JDK 1.3.1 (just did a test to be sure). > I think it would be best to have the JMX implementation included > with sigar. As the JMX lib is not required during runtime as long as the JMX code is not accessed, that should be OK. > The work you've done so far looks great to me, how about if > we set you up with commit access and you can then hack away on the > sigar.jmx package? Thanks! Sounds good to me! I guess the login 'bmartin' would fit your user name pattern? BTW: Could you give me a JIRA account as well, please? Either self-registration is deactivatedm I missed it or you don't want me to find bugs ;-) Cheers, Bjoern |