htmlvalidator-help Mailing List for HTML Validator for Mozilla and Firefox (Page 11)
Brought to you by:
mgueury
You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(65) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-06-07 23:10:34
|
Hi NoWhereMan, Thanks for the suggestion. It is in the todos for a future version. I have no idea how to do it. But it should be possible. Just that I do not have enough time to work a lot on the extension in the last months due that taking care of the extension overlap with private events. Whatever, it is moving slowly. And it is really a feature I would like to have in one of the next version. For me too. Marc Cc to the mailing-list. NoWhereMan wrote: > Hi, > > first of all let me say I LOVE this extension, and that is my best > friend in web development, so thanks! > > Now, I'd like to ask for a little feature (I don't know how many efforts > would require, if too much, then forget it :)). > > I'd like to be able to reposition the warning/error/valid icon. For > instance, I'd like to get rid of the status bar to have a wider browsing > area, so it would be nice having a button to put near the address bar > (reachable through "customize..." left click menu). > > Again, great work, and thanks for the time. > Bye, > > --NoWhereMan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > > |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-06-07 23:02:07
|
Hi Dimpared, It seems it is possible to make it work the extension for PPC with a program called Rosetta ? Whatever, I got already several mail about this and I have personally no MacOSX for Intel. I can not compile it. One Intel MacOSX user needs to do it. The instructions to compile the extension are here: > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/compile.html Marc dimpared wrote: > I am a web developer and loyal user of your Html Validator extension. > We have even incorporated it into our curriculum at a college where > we teach all aspects of digital media. I'm part of the Web department, > where we teach standards based web design and development. It truly is > a wonderful tool, and I feel lost without it, because it currently > does not work properly on my new macbook. I'm wondering if there are > plans to support the OSX intel architecture, or if there is a way to > compile it to work. Thanks for your support and for making such a > wonderful and incredibly useful Firefox Extension. > > Best Regards, > Dimpared > > |
From: NoWhereMan <now...@fl...> - 2006-06-06 19:29:40
|
Hi, first of all let me say I LOVE this extension, and that is my best friend in web development, so thanks! Now, I'd like to ask for a little feature (I don't know how many efforts would require, if too much, then forget it :)). I'd like to be able to reposition the warning/error/valid icon. For instance, I'd like to get rid of the status bar to have a wider browsing area, so it would be nice having a button to put near the address bar (reachable through "customize..." left click menu). Again, great work, and thanks for the time. Bye, --NoWhereMan |
From: Xiamen G. & H. D. S. <xmg...@ai...> - 2006-06-06 02:17:15
|
<html> <head> <title>Invitation</title></head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" link="#682F73" vlink=purple class="Normal" lang=ZH-CN> <table width="697" height="957" border="0" align="center" background="c:/html/image002.gif"> <tr> <td><table width="660" border="0" align="center"> <tr> <td> <b><span style='font-size:18.0pt;font-family:Arial'><center>Invitation</center></span></b><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'><b>D</b>ear Sir Or Madam,</span><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'><b>C</b>hinese Xiamen Gift and Home Decoration Show (<a href="http://www.xmghs.com/">www.xmghs.com</a>), an important trading event supported by Xiamen Municipal Government, has been held successfully for three years. As the first export-oriented professional craft show in China, it attracts more than 5000 overseas corporations from over 60 countries every year. </span><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial;color:black'><b>T</b>he 4<sup>th</sup> session of Xiamen Gift & Home Decoration Show will be held on Oct.15-18, 2006 in Xiamen City, Fujian Province, which is a gateway to Chinese Gifts & Decorations Market. In this upcoming stirring event, a wider selection of products will be on displayed with more than 32000 square meters of over 1500 booths, ranging from Gifts & Premiums, Home Supplies & Decorations, X'mas and Festival & Party Items to Garden Decorations & Handicrafts. </span><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'><b>W</b>e sincerely invite you to attend this upcoming stirring event, where you could find golden purchase opportunities and fresh industrial trend. It is really appreciated if you could kindly inform us your opinion by replying this email. Thank you in advance for your generous consideration. </span><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'><b>W</b>e look forward to hearing from you soon.</span><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial;color:black'><b>B</b>est Regards,</span><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial;color:black'><b>Y</b>ours sincerely,</span><br><br> <span style='font-family:Arial;color:black'>Jessie Chen</span><br> <span style='font-family:Arial;'>Xiamen Gift & Home Decoration Show</span><br> <span style='font-family:Arial;'>Add: Xiamen International Conference & Exhibition Centre, China</span><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'>Tel: +86-592-5959288</span><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'>Fax: +86-592-5959188</span><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'>Email: <a href="mailto:xmg...@ya...">xmg...@ya...</a></span><br> <span style='font-family:Arial'><a href="http://www.xmghs.com/">www.xmghs.com</a></span> </td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> </table> </body> </html> |
From: Ben <ben...@gm...> - 2006-06-02 23:14:26
|
Are there any plans to release a Universal Binary version of the extension for Intel Macs? The current version 0.7.9.2 doesn't seem to work ... ("-/-" and view-source doesn't work at all). Thanks, Ben |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-06-02 11:34:51
|
Stupid me forgot to attach the file. |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-06-02 11:33:47
|
I recognized that my algorithm does not recognize nested line breaks. So here is a version that reorganizes the document until all line breaks are direct children of the <pre> tags. I also fixed the line numbering calls to use setTimeout(), to spawn the line numbering in a different thread, so that Firefox keeps reacting while everything is prepared to start the parallel threaded part of the line numbering. Also I removed a bug where lines disappeared when a <pre> only contains a single line, which is the case in about:blank. On my Pentium-M 1300 MHz your lot_of_lines.html takes 32 seconds. That means it does 341 lines per second, which is OK for me, considering the massive amount of parsing and restructuring that is done. |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-06-02 07:13:48
|
Hi Sebastian, Can you explain a little more ? - You used an older version and had no problem is it right ? - Are you using accessibility check ? I have never seen a crash since maybe 1 year. It is maybe due to the type of Linux you have in comparison with mine ? Which one ? Which CPU type ? Do you see a core file appearing when it crashes ? Can you give a step by step to reproduce the crash ? Thanks Marc Sebastian Wiedenroth wrote: > Hello, > > since upgrading the Validator extension my Firefox crashes on some sites. > Some examples are google, heise.de (a german news site) and some others. > My Firefox version is 1.5.0.3 on Linux and i have these other extensions > installed: > * Adblock v5 > * EditCSS 0.3.5 > * HashColouredTabs 0.3.3 > * Mouse Gestures 1.5 > > It would be nice if you coud fix this problem because i use this great > extension very often :-) > I haved attached a debug log and hope it gives you the needed information. > If you need any more information from me just drop me a mail. > > Thanks, > Sebastian Wiedenroth > |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-06-02 01:07:45
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > Hi Dominic, > > I just look the result. It is good in a way is that the line wrapping > works fine. It works > really well for small files. Unhappily, there are also big files. I am > attaching one to this mail. > Adding the line number with your procedure takes 20/30 sec on my pC and > Firefox ask to > stop the script. This is the problem with most algorithm I used for now. > There are too slow. > > This is pity since your code is really well written and would work on > Unix ... > > Marc > The attached file is the multi threaded implementation of my algorithm. To my surprise I get the best results on a single core machine when I spawn 16 parallel threads. I don't know weather it makes sense to double it on a dual core machine, but this could be made tunable in the options. I'd suggest the options 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 and 256. I don't think that more would make sense. Less than 8 is a bad idea, at least on my machine. Now, some changes that I had to make outside of my methods: The method start() is now taking a parameter. This parameter is required to be able to spawn processes with setTimeout that run methods within the object. Thus it has to hold the name of a globally accessible variable that points to the object. That means the lines: oTidyValidate = new TidyValidate(); oTidyValidate.start(); are changed into: oTidyValidate = new TidyValidate(); oTidyValidate.start('oTidyValidate'); I also changed the function tidyValidateHtml() to call my line numbering implementation instead of yours. Unfortunately there are still some problems left. The "Go to line" feature does not work. If line numbers are present this could be achieved simply by jumping to the Nth <li> in the document. Alternatively every line could be equipped with an <a name="lineXXX" /> at the beginning. Another problem is that switching highlighting on or off hides the line numbers. Even removing them and activating them again doesn't fix this. My guess is that the style of the <ol> gets changed (to be found through the attribute sourceList). So this shouldn't be too difficult to fix. I hope this version will stand up to your testing. |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-06-01 16:32:38
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > Hi Dominic, >=20 > I just look the result. It is good in a way is that the line wrapping > works fine. It works > really well for small files. Unhappily, there are also big files. I am > attaching one to this mail. > Adding the line number with your procedure takes 20/30 sec on my pC and= > Firefox ask to > stop the script. This is the problem with most algorithm I used for now= =2E > There are too slow. >=20 > This is pity since your code is really well written and would work on > Unix ... >=20 > Marc >=20 > Ps : see the attached file >=20 OK, I'm on it, I think I can deal with this by paralleling the process. I spent 10 minutes on this and I got it so far that Firefox completely locks up for 20 seconds on my Pentium-M 1300MHz. After this it will react normally and be done with the numbering - without complaining about the script. I think I can make the script do the numbering in background. I expect it to take about 40 seconds for the file you sent me when I'm done, with the advantage that Firefox stays usable during that period. A nice side effect will be that machines with more than one core would do the numbering significantly faster. |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-06-01 16:16:23
|
Hi Jesse, For the request 1, error at the top is already in 0.8x beta. Since I work like you :-) Look the screenshots here: > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html I do not understand you second point ? Can you rephrase it ? Thanks, Marc Jesse Ehrenzweig wrote: > Marc -- > > First of all, HTML Validator is excellent. I was manually > copy-and-pasting code into the W3C Validator, when I realized "/hey, > there has to be a Firefox extension that does a better job of this/". > Lo and behold, your component found its way onto my machine, and I'm > now in the process of making sure all websites I write are HTML 4.01 > Transitional compliant. So thank you for making my life a lot easier. =) > > I do have two small feature requests for your consideration. After > you double-click on the "*HTML Validation Result*" icon in the > lower-right corner of Firefox, the "*view-source*" window opens and > the "*HTML Warnings and Errors*" content pane scrolls to the bottom of > all the error messages. Here's what I usually do: > > 1) Look at the total # of errors & warnings > 2) Scroll to the top of the list of error messages, to see what > the first few errors are > 3) Tweak my code to fix those issues > 4) Refresh the source code pane > 5) Go back to #1, if necessary > > > It would be helpful if: > > 1) "*# errors / # warnings*" is displayed at the _*top*_ of the > "*HTML Warnings and Errors*" content pane, instead of at the bottom. > 2) *_Top_* of the "*HTML Warnings and Errors*" content pane is > shown when the "*view-source*" window is first opened or refreshed, > instead of the bottom. > > > I'm sure everybody has their own way of debugging, but it would save > me the few seconds each time spent looking at the total error/warning > counts, then having to scroll to the top of the "*HTML Warnings and > Errors*" pane to see what the first few errors are. Anyway, let me > know if these sound like reasonable / useful requests, and keep up the > great work! > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Jesse Ehrenzweig > Facts On File, Inc. > http://www.factsonfile.com > |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-31 23:05:38
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > Maybe you can try to start Firefox with Truss/Strace to see what it doe= s ? > Please look also the message in the javascript console. >=20 > Normally the library shoud be in the extension dir after install, > something like this: >=20 > ... >=20 Yes, it's there. That's the confusing part. Anyway, I will have a look at those tools you suggested. Thanks a lot. Did you test the line numbering, yet? |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-05-31 22:58:16
|
Maybe you can try to start Firefox with Truss/Strace to see what it does ? Please look also the message in the javascript console. Normally the library shoud be in the extension dir after install, something like this: ~/.mozilla/firefox/m7flzp39.default/extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components/libnstidy.so Marc [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Marc Gueury wrote: >> >>> A) Please restart firefox as root and install the extension. >>> B) Or move the directory manually from one place to the other. >>> >> I am not fond of things that do things without the consent of my package >> system. Now that I know the cause I shall find a better solution. >> >> > > When dealing with sgml-lib by tidy will again complain about the missing > library. I tried putting libnstidy.so and libosp.so almost anywhere > where it would make even the smallest degree of sense to no avail. > > |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-05-31 22:52:14
|
Hi David, I got somebody else that explained me the same issue. It seems too that the extension 0.792 solve the problem on Firefox 1.0.8. Probably Firefox 1.5 solve the problem too. The version 0.792 is available here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/ Marc David Boersma wrote: > Hi, > > I finally upgraded to firefox 1.5.0.3, and on other websites I see > taht the javascript performance significantly improves. In the options > menu I removed the .gmail.com and google.com exceptions, but somehow > that has no effect: htmltidy still claims that these domains are "Not > in the domain list". I'll try uninstalling and re-installing the > extension, but I suppose even if that works, it's not supposed to be > necessary. > > David > > PS: I have no root permission on my desktop machine at work, so I just > extracted the firefox tarball into some local directory and started > firefox directly from there (yes, using full path). The old > installation is still where it was, so if there is any part of FF > which can be confused by multiple installs then this might be relevant > for the diagnosis of any bug I report. > > On 5/13/06, David Boersma <dav...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> No, I didn't. I am travelling now & will be very busy for a while. I >> could of course try to download & install a newer version, but I'm a >> bit afraid that it might be hard to go back to the version supplied & >> supported by RHEL4 and our helpdesk. And I really need my laptop and >> browser. So for a while I'll be a coward on this and refrain from >> experiments. >> >> Sorry, >> David >> >> On 5/13/06, Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> wrote: >> > Hi David, >> > >> > Just by curiosity. Have you tried with a higher version of Firefox ? >> > I think the problem is related to a bug in the javascript engine of >> Firefox. >> > >> > Marc >> > >> > David Boersma wrote: >> > > Hi Marc, >> > > >> > > I had not noticed the options yet... :-) >> > > But indeed the disabling of .gmail.com works and now I can both use >> > > htmltidy on most web pages AND read gmail, so for the moment I'm >> > > happy. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > David >> > > >> > > On 5/12/06, Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> wrote: >> > >> Hi David, >> > >> >> > >> I heard the same story from another linux user. >> > >> It seems to be a problem in Linux only. The same worked for him on >> > >> windows. I had no time yet to look at this. >> > >> What I would recommend in the meanwhile is to go to the >> > >> options and disable the validation for the domain of gmail. >> > >> >> > >> I need to check and to reproduce the issue to say more about it. >> > >> >> > >> Marc >> > >> >> > >> David Boersma wrote: >> > >> > Hi! >> > >> > >> > >> > I like the "htmltidy" firefox plugin that you wrote, but it >> seems that >> > >> > it interferes with Gmail; when I try to access my Gmail inbox >> then it >> > >> > gets stuck during loading, I only get this friendly message from >> > >> > Google saying that it seems to take longer than usual. The >> problem is >> > >> > very reproducible: when I uninstall this addon, then Gmail works >> > >> > again, when I re-install then Gmail gets stuck as before. I >> did not >> > >> > see this mentioned elsewhere, so maybe it's just a problem >> with my >> > >> > setup. I run FF 1.0.8 on a redhat EL4 machine and most other FF >> > >> > add-ons run just fine. >> > >> > Any hints? >> > >> > >> > >> > BTW: I posted this comment to the mozilla add-ons website in the >> > >> > comment section of this add-on, but I realize that that is the >> wrong >> > >> > place for this question. The page explicitly states that I >> should ask >> > >> > this to you. So I regret that I posted it there, instead of >> mailing >> > >> > you directly. Do you know if I can remove that comment of mine >> from >> > >> > the page? >> > >> > >> > >> > David >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-31 15:55:36
|
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >=20 > Marc Gueury wrote: >> A) Please restart firefox as root and install the extension. >> B) Or move the directory manually from one place to the other. >=20 > I am not fond of things that do things without the consent of my packag= e > system. Now that I know the cause I shall find a better solution. >=20 When dealing with sgml-lib by tidy will again complain about the missing library. I tried putting libnstidy.so and libosp.so almost anywhere where it would make even the smallest degree of sense to no avail. |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-31 14:37:21
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > HI Dominic, >=20 > Have you found the cause of the problem ? I see that you have sent > another mail about line > numbering ? >=20 Well, have a look at that one. It's a lot of code, but it seems to work fine. And I tried to comment it to an acceptable degree. > A) Please restart firefox as root and install the extension. > B) Or move the directory manually from one place to the other. I am not fond of things that do things without the consent of my package system. Now that I know the cause I shall find a better solution. |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-05-31 14:29:31
|
HI Dominic, Have you found the cause of the problem ? I see that you have sent another mail about line numbering ? The issue seems to be in, Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520015 (NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED) [nsIFile.moveTo]" nsresult: "0x80520015 (NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://tidy/content/tidyInstall.js :: tidyInstallPlatformLibraryIfNeeded :: line 124" data: no] The file tidyInstall.js is a file of the extension. I think that at line 124, it copies the directory sgml-lib from ~/.mozilla/profile/.../extension/{3....} to the directory where Firefox is installed If the user that started Firefox has no right to write in the directory where Firefox is installed it will probably gives this error. A) Please restart firefox as root and install the extension. B) Or move the directory manually from one place to the other. Hope it helps, Marc [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Marc Gueury wrote: > >> Hi Dominic, >> >> 0. type about:config in Firefox and check that >> javascript.options.showInConsole = true >> javascript.options.strict = true >> Restart Firefox. >> 1. Please look in the javascript console to see if you have any error. >> And which one. >> > > I get the following error: > > Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure > code: 0x80520015 (NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED) [nsIFile.moveTo]" > nsresult: "0x80520015 (NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED)" location: "JS > frame :: chrome://tidy/content/tidyInstall.js :: > tidyInstallPlatformLibraryIfNeeded :: line 124" data: no] > > >> 2. Please also check that the libnstidy.so is well compiled and copied >> in the >> xpi/component directory before to be zipped. >> > > It is there. > > >> 3. Please also check the size of libosp.so and libosp.a. If the both >> have about >> the same size, it means that libosp.a will be static linked and >> libosp.so not needed. >> > > libosp.a has 3.9M and libosp.so has 2.1M. Does this look all right? > libnstidy.so only has 1.9M. That doesn't look properly to me. > > >> 4. If it does not work, consider to copy that library libnstidy.so in >> the Program directory of >> Firefox and see if it works. >> > > No, that doesn't help. > > >> 5. make a ldd libnstidy.so just to check >> > > # ldd libnstidy.so > libnstidy.so: > libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x2835e000) > libplc4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x28385000) > libnspr4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libnspr4.so.1 (0x283ad000) > libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x283de000) > libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x284cc000) > libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x2859f000) > > > I'm out of ideas. > > |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-31 13:38:14
|
Here is my version of tidyValidate.js that can do line numbering independent of the line wrapping. I introduced the attributes document, viewsource and sourcelist and the methods list, unlist, listNodeChildren, unlistNodeChildren. Apart from that I made changes to the showLineNumber method. Please do not use listNodeChildren and unlistNodeChildren directly, they will most likely destroy the document if not called through list and unlist, since they don't contain any checking. This line numbering breaks the go to line feature. |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-31 00:51:25
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > Hi Dominic, >=20 > 0. type about:config in Firefox and check that > javascript.options.showInConsole =3D true > javascript.options.strict =3D true > Restart Firefox. > 1. Please look in the javascript console to see if you have any error. > And which one. I get the following error: Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520015 (NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED) [nsIFile.moveTo]" nsresult: "0x80520015 (NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://tidy/content/tidyInstall.js :: tidyInstallPlatformLibraryIfNeeded :: line 124" data: no] > 2. Please also check that the libnstidy.so is well compiled and copied > in the > xpi/component directory before to be zipped. It is there. > 3. Please also check the size of libosp.so and libosp.a. If the both > have about > the same size, it means that libosp.a will be static linked and > libosp.so not needed. libosp.a has 3.9M and libosp.so has 2.1M. Does this look all right? libnstidy.so only has 1.9M. That doesn't look properly to me. > 4. If it does not work, consider to copy that library libnstidy.so in > the Program directory of > Firefox and see if it works. No, that doesn't help. > 5. make a ldd libnstidy.so just to check # ldd libnstidy.so libnstidy.so: libplds4.so.1 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x2835e000) libplc4.so.1 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x28385000) libnspr4.so.1 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libnspr4.so.1 (0x283ad000) libiconv.so.3 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x283de000) libstdc++.so.5 =3D> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x284cc000) libm.so.4 =3D> /lib/libm.so.4 (0x2859f000) I'm out of ideas. |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-05-30 23:53:54
|
Hi Dominic, 0. type about:config in Firefox and check that javascript.options.showInConsole = true javascript.options.strict = true Restart Firefox. 1. Please look in the javascript console to see if you have any error. And which one. 2. Please also check that the libnstidy.so is well compiled and copied in the xpi/component directory before to be zipped. 3. Please also check the size of libosp.so and libosp.a. If the both have about the same size, it means that libosp.a will be static linked and libosp.so not needed. 4. If it does not work, consider to copy that library libnstidy.so in the Program directory of Firefox and see if it works. 5. make a ldd libnstidy.so just to check Marc [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Marc Gueury wrote: > >> Hi Dominic, >> >> I reuploaded the right version today that is from the 30/05/2006. Here, >> >> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >> >> Please check here, you were right, the javascript part was >> the one of 0.791. On Linux, the libosp.a, is linked statically and >> there is no libosp.so, unlike on Windows. I suppose it will be the >> same for FreeBSD. >> >> Marc >> >> > > This version doesn't give me error messages, but it doesn't validate > anything either. In the bottom right it just shows the green icon and > -/-. In the view source the tidy windows stay empty, only the source is > shown. The progress bar simply keeps on moving endlessly. > > |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-30 20:08:58
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > Hi Dominic, >=20 > I reuploaded the right version today that is from the 30/05/2006. Here,= >=20 > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >=20 > Please check here, you were right, the javascript part was > the one of 0.791. On Linux, the libosp.a, is linked statically and > there is no libosp.so, unlike on Windows. I suppose it will be the > same for FreeBSD. >=20 > Marc >=20 This version doesn't give me error messages, but it doesn't validate anything either. In the bottom right it just shows the green icon and -/-. In the view source the tidy windows stay empty, only the source is shown. The progress bar simply keeps on moving endlessly. |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-05-30 19:09:33
|
Wonderfull. I will try to publish the version 0.792 soon as the stable release. Thanks, Marc Robert Whittaker wrote: > On Tue, 30 May 2006, Marc Gueury wrote: >> I think that it is an issue with Gmail only on Linux and only with >> Firefox 1.0.x. Can you do this: 1) try with the latest version 0.792 >> that you can find here: >> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html > > That seems to have fixed it, thanks :) > > (Not that I really want it to work with gmail, but as I don't use > gmail that often I didn't connect the install of tidy with the reason > for gmail stopping working; it left me a perplexed for a while!) > > BWT: I forgot to say before - I think it's a great extension. > > Thanks again, > |
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-05-30 19:08:29
|
Hi Dominic, I reuploaded the right version today that is from the 30/05/2006. Here, http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html Please check here, you were right, the javascript part was the one of 0.791. On Linux, the libosp.a, is linked statically and there is no libosp.so, unlike on Windows. I suppose it will be the same for FreeBSD. Marc [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Marc Gueury wrote: > >> Hi Dominic, >> >> Please get the new source here >> (http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html) >> <http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html> >> I have included the pathes in my source and I even builded a Linux >> version that worked, except that: >> - I had to copy manually the sgml-lib directory in the Firefox directory >> - the line numbering does not work on Linux. >> >> Except that it was working fine, >> >> There is a build_all.sh in the root of the C part of the extension to help >> to build it. >> >> Marc >> >> > > I got it all to build fine, but build_xpi.sh doesn't pack libosp.so. > Where does it belong? Even if I manually place it in xpi/components the > extension tells me > > FATAL ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file > could not be found. > > It doesn't tell me which one is not found. Something else I recognized, > the extension identifies itself as 0.7.9.1 and the > chrome/content/tidyValidate.js that is packed in tidy.jar massively > differs from the one you sent me separately to work on line numbering. > For example none of the addLineNumber functions are present. > > |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-30 14:54:27
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > Hi Dominic, >=20 > Please get the new source here > (http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html) > <http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html> > I have included the pathes in my source and I even builded a Linux > version that worked, except that: > - I had to copy manually the sgml-lib directory in the Firefox director= y > - the line numbering does not work on Linux. >=20 > Except that it was working fine, >=20 > There is a build_all.sh in the root of the C part of the extension to h= elp > to build it. >=20 > Marc >=20 I got it all to build fine, but build_xpi.sh doesn't pack libosp.so. Where does it belong? Even if I manually place it in xpi/components the extension tells me FATAL ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be found. It doesn't tell me which one is not found. Something else I recognized, the extension identifies itself as 0.7.9.1 and the chrome/content/tidyValidate.js that is packed in tidy.jar massively differs from the one you sent me separately to work on line numbering. For example none of the addLineNumber functions are present. |
From: [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN...@gm...> - 2006-05-30 11:50:55
|
Marc Gueury wrote: > Hi Dominic, >=20 > Please get the new source here > (http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html) > <http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html> > I have included the pathes in my source and I even builded a Linux > version that worked, except that: > - I had to copy manually the sgml-lib directory in the Firefox director= y > - the line numbering does not work on Linux. >=20 > Except that it was working fine, >=20 > There is a build_all.sh in the root of the C part of the extension to h= elp > to build it. >=20 > Marc >=20 Thanks a lot, once I've got everything up and running I will start to work on the line numbering. |