Re: [HtmlUnit] Useability Enhancements

[Marc G. <mgu...@ya...>]

Personnally I mainly consider htmlunit only as a browser (the one I use inside webtest) and therefore I think that 
assertXXX methods have nothing to do in the main "browser" classes.

Nevertheless, for your 2 examples:
- instead of HtmlPage.clickLinkWithText(String), we could imagine a HtmlPage.getAnchorWithText(String).click() (there is 
already getAnchorByHref())
- instead of HtmlPage.assertTitleEquals(String), we could imagine a base unit test class providing utility like 
assertTitleEquals(String, HtmlPage). This would avoid to have the test methods leak in the "browser".

Marc.

Gredler, Daniel (Matrix) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I recently ran across jWebUnit (http://jwebunit.sourceforge.net/), which is
> essentially an extension of HttpUnit, allowing unit testing using more
> concise code. It includes convenience methods like clickLinkWithText(String)
> and assertTitleEquals(String). What do you guys think about adding this kind
> of ease-of-use methods to HtmlPage, for example?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> HtmlUnit-develop mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-develop
>