From: Neal R. <ne...@ri...> - 2006-05-25 17:38:37
|
OK. Let's do it. Sourceforge is also bothering us about disk usage... Arg. On Fri, 12 May 2006, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote: > On May 12, 2006, at 1:49 AM, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: > >> >> On May 11, 2006, at 8:33 PM, Neal Richter wrote: >> >>> FYI: >> >> For what it's worth, I'd suggest any ht://Dig development move wholesale to >> the Subversion service from SourceForge. There's very little pain -- mostly >> convincing your fingers to type svn instead of cvs. (Or setting cvs to be >> an alias for svn in your shell.) >> >> There are quite a few advantages beyond avoiding the current CVS pains at >> SourceForge. For example, finally being able to move files and directories >> without killing the repository history... >> > I agree. I find Subversion to be an improvement over CVS. > > Ted Stresen-Reuter > > -- Neal Richter Sr. Researcher and Machine Learning Lead Software Development RightNow Technologies, Inc. Customer Service for Every Web Site Office: 406-522-1485 |