From: Geoff H. <ghu...@ws...> - 2002-10-18 14:03:15
|
On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 08:46 AM, Pub Litics wrote: > technophobic]. Or, do you strongly recommend that we go with 3.1.6? > Whatever you say, we'll do. We are on a shared server, however, and do > not have root access, so that had been a problem in the past and could > possibly be an obstacle now. Just let us know what you recommend. We strongly recommend using 3.1.6, for security and stability reasons: <http://www.htdig.org/RELEASE.html> > underline characters, so, at present, there are no hidden characters in > htdig.conf file, at all. Is that the way it is supposed to be? Does > that answer your question, adequately? Yes, I'd assume this is exactly what Gilles wanted to know. > Finally, I did not check the file date-stamp, because, as I mentioned, > I think it is now working, by excluding the proper sub-directories. Good to hear that it's working! Cheers, -- -Geoff Hutchison Williams Students Online http://wso.williams.edu/ |