Re: [Hibernate] Suggestion: Encapsulate SQLException in HibernateException

[Max R. A. <ma...@eo...>]

Im approx +0 on this one :)

Gavin, why was this done in the first place ? Seem to remember somewhere
that the docs states:

Free from my mind: "Hibernate does not hide what's happening. e.g.
SQLExceptions is propagated all the way up to the user." .


/max


----- Original Message -----
From: "One Ovthafew" <1ov...@mb...>
To: <hib...@li...>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Suggestion: Encapsulate SQLException in
HibernateException


> I am happy to introduce a JDBCException that wraps any SQLExceptions
> that occur. However, I don't have a strong view either way. So lets just
> vote on this....
>
> Gavin
>
> >> I was thinking about wrapping SQLException in HibernateException, so
> that we don't need to worry about catch HibernateException and
> SQLException. Since now the work is focused on some changes for
> Hibernate 2, this could be the right time to do this kind of change.
> This would simplify the error handling in the applications. <<
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Never lose a fax again, receive faxes to your personal email account!
> Visit http://www.mbox.com.au/fax
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-devel mailing list
> hib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
>