From: Joel Rosi-S. <Joe...@Et...> - 2002-12-06 11:10:52
|
Hi Christoph, Yes, this is exactly the point I was bringing up. You see I *will* be using a Session bean, not doubts about it, that is what is right for *my* architecture. But other designs will call for different solutions. So what is the best solution as far as designing a provider or hierarchy of providers so that the various common usage scenarios are accounted for. Ideas? - joel Christoph Sturm wrote: >Hi Joel! > >it would be great if you work on a security provider for osuser, but IMHO it >would be good not to use a session bean for it. Then it would be also usable >in pure servlet containers, for example resin. > >regards > chris >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Joel Rosi-Schwartz" <Joe...@Et...> >To: "Patrick Lightbody" <pli...@ci...> >Cc: <hib...@li...>; ><ope...@li...> >Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:08 PM >Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Re: [Opensymphony-developers] A Hibranate provider >for OsUser? > > > > >>Patrick, >> >>Fine, I'll be happy to make this contribution. My plans are to use a >>Session bean and have it retieve the the Hibernate SessionFactory via >>JNDI. Does this suit your needs? One of the problems with integrating >>Hibernate with OsUser is that Hibernate is so flexible and that there >>are several applicable use cases. I have not really begun to explore how >>to best design a provider such that it is easy to use in all them and I >>would really appreciate any suggestion? >> >>- joel >> >>Patrick Lightbody wrote: >> >> |