From: Gavin K. <ga...@ap...> - 2002-09-20 09:03:28
|
> In some situations it would also be fine if I could just get the name of the > match table with cat.match (just like cat.elements). I have a (legacy) > database mapping here where the match tables contain all kinds of stuff (a > sortpos, some date fields), that i could all use for order by, so it would > be practical for me. Hmmm this is something that never really occurred to me before. We have proper support for match tables by using <composite-element> mappings (a very powerful feature that I'm not sure people actually understand properly). However queries can never refer to fields of composite elements! Even with the new indexing [] stuff, I havn't (yet) implemented support for composite elements. |