From: Christian B. <chr...@bl...> - 2002-07-25 10:22:04
|
On 25 Jul (11:53), Gavin_King/Cirrus%CI...@ci... wrote: > I need more time to think some of the reordering through .... the > previous order was designed to get people started as quick as > possible ... topics went from "basic" to "advanced". The new > ordering is much more by subject which makes it more readable > for most users but perhaps harder for brand new users just > getting started. Anyway, I will put some thought into this and > perhaps suggest some further changes. My initial intention was to provide a complete reference documentation for all features. One of the next steps would be to provide "Quickstart" documentation for different scenarios. But I don't think this should be _in_ the reference documentation. > cool. unfortunately I'm having trouble checking this stuff out of CVS. > Are you sure you checked in all the binary files with -kb? Gah, used -ko, my fault. I think this can be fixed with a cvs admin -kb command? > I would very much prefer Ant if its at all possible. I've finally > started using the ant build script to generate javadoc, etc, So > it would be really nice to integrate this stuff with the existing > stuff. My dream is to eventually be able to do a whole release > with just a single Ant task but I'm not there yet ;) OK, I will try Ant. > yes, I would like to do this stuff for 1.0.2 if possible, since I want > to document the new 1.0.2 features in docbook. Could you tell me > exactly how up to date the docbook text is compared to the aft text? I > did make a couple of minor changes this week and I might need to copy > them over. You will need to add your changes, the converted version is more than a week old. P.S. I'm subscribed to the devloper list, no need to Cc. :) -- Christian Bauer tu...@in... |