From: Gavin_King/Cirrus%<CI...@ci...> - 2002-03-02 05:30:19
|
> Hmm. The before-select timestamp is the local time? If the database > uses versioning (or caching) internally, the select could return stuff > as old as the start of the transaction... which could be earlier than > after-update even when before-select isn't. aaahhhh of course. interesting. So we should use a timestamp from before the start of the session? PS i should have mentioned two cases where we _know_ this algorithm breaks 1. using JTA. 2. non-exclusive access to database any *other* problems? |