From: Doug C. <de...@fl...> - 2002-02-19 03:03:58
|
> Many thanks for all this great stuff. If you think Hibernate + McKoi are > working well together now then we should document the fact - add McKoi to > the supported list, along with a list of the problems and a pointer to your > patch. (I was kind of aware that there were issues with McKoi, so I had > never mentioned it in the documentation so far.) I would feel more comfortable waiting until Toby releases 0.93. He has been supportive of my distributing the patches and descriptions of the shortcomings to the hibernate-devel list, but I think we should wait until a released Mckoi is more compatible right out of the box. A counter-argument is that Mckoi seems to work almost as well as Interbase, so if you want to make the supported db list longer... :-). >> I have determined that Mckoi supports composite keys just fine; the >> problem was in the handling of Dates as keys. > (snip) >> It seems that Mckoi stores all the milliseconds in the database > So are DATE and TIMESTAMP synonyms in McKoi? Strange. Yeah. Mckoi just puts the long value date.getTime() into the database for all three types DATE TIME and TIMESTAMP (actually I think TIMESTAMP maybe gets a few more bits). Toby has fixing this on his TO DO list. e |