Re: [Hibernate] instrument tasks

[Max R. A. <max...@jb...>]

> Another capability that I would like to see would be to limit
> instrumentation to only fields which are defined in a Hibernate mapping.
> Currently the instrument tasks do not know anything about the mappings,
> so the first change to allow this would be facilitate the passing or
> definition of a Configuration into the tasks.  The tools already have
> such a task used in their ant task stacks.  So we would need to decide
> whether it makes more sense to move the instrument tasks over to the
> tools subproject, or to consume the <configuration/> sub task from tools
> into core and make use of it from the instrument tasks.

The "easiest" thing codewise is to move the instruments task to  
hibernate-tools,
since the sourrounding <hibernatetool> task is the actual Ant entry point  
and
the <configuration/>, <ejb3configuration>, <annotationconfiguration>, etc.  
are defined in there.
There is also the whole freemarker/templating setup dependency.

...thinking about it an alternative way could be to define a superclass  
for the current
org.hibernate.tool.ant.HibernateToolTask that would just handle the  
core-built-in ant tasks.

then users would have the same ant "API", but users would have to change  
their <hibernatetool> taskdef
to use the "tool" provided tasks.

Another context for this alignment/move is the talks we have had about  
allowing customization of
schemaexport/update ...that would also be relevant to ensure it fits into  
this scheme.

-- 
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
ma...@hi...
http://hibernate.org

JBoss Inc
max...@jb...