Re: [Hibernate] CacheProviders

[Steve E. <ste...@jb...>]

Sure.  Your provider could do whatever you wanted in terms of using XYZ
for data caches, ABC for query caches, and DEF for general caches...

Another one is an optimistic tree-cache for entity data caches, and a
pessimistic tree-cache for the others.

Etc...


-----Original Message-----
From: Max Andersen=20
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 7:06 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate development
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] CacheProviders


> Additionally, we may want to split the Cache interface into separate
> interfaces also based on usage; this would only be intended to allow
> clearer definition of the capabilities allowed from each usage
scenario.

sounds like a good thing, code-readability/maintainability wise.

>
> Another nice benefit of this would be to allow "mixed providers".
Like
> imagine a clustered data cache along with a local query cache.

+1.

What about "mixed providers" in general ? e.g. being able to use EhCache

for
some entities and JBossCache for others ?

--=20
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
ma...@hi...
http://hibernate.org

JBoss Inc
max...@jb...