I had the same idea for the syntax, but I wanted to make sure you agreed
with that before I dove in and started working on it.
As a quick hack just to get my app up and running I patched Hibernate to
allow me to queries like:
from foo in class eg.Foo where foo.subid = 69
However I didn't feel like this was an accurate representation of the object
relationships so I now I'd like to do it right.
It might take a few days to implement this since I'm in the middle of
another project, but since I need this in quite a few places I am motivated
to implement this.
Cheers,
Jon...
----- Original Message -----
From: <Gavin_King/Cirrus%CI...@ci...>
To: "Jon Lipsky" <jon...@xe...>
Cc: <hib...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Hibernate-devel] Queries on objects with composite keys...
>
>
> >> I am correct in my findings that you cannot currently do queries based
> on composite keys where you only want to select using only 1 of the
> composite key properties? The only way currently supported is to do a
> "find" for the object using the composite key object, right?
>
> Yeah, thats about right. Nor can you frame queries that would require a
> table join on the composite key.
>
> >> I ended up patching Hibernate so you can do a select based on the
> composite key, however I think the way I did it is only valid as a
> temporary solution. I would be willing to work on adding complete query
> support for composite keys if anyone else thinks there is demand for this.
>
> Sounds great! Any work you could do in this area is _much_
> appreciated!Exactly what are you proposing? I'm thinking a syntax
something
> like:
>
> from foo in class eg.Foo where foo.id.subid = 69
>
> where id is the composite identifier of eg.Foo.
>
> I apologise for all the hand-written parsing code for the query language.
I
> knew zero about lexing + parsing at the time so I ended up doing by hand
> what I should have used ANTLR for. It was my intention to reimplement the
> query language using an antlr grammar I wrote later. (Yeah, I educated
> myself since.) However, since this is the very first feature request to do
> with queries, I'm now inclined to leave alone a feature that seems to be
> serving everyone quite well :)
>
> Thanks for the offer of help
>
> peace
>
> Gavin
>
|
