[Gwc-general] another case of problems compiling gwc-0.19-5

[John C. <ci...@pu...>]

I know you love getting these. I can't tell what is failing this 
time. gwc-0.19-2 still compiles fine, and also gwc-0.19-3 with the 
minor mod I reported a few months ago. But gwc-0.19-5 just pukes 
when it hits gwc.c. Here is what it complains about:

[jcirillo@john1 gwc-0.19-5]$ make
cc -O3 -Wall -DHAVE_FFTW -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 `gnome-config 
--cflags gnome gnomeui`   -c -o gwc.o gwc.c
gwc.c: In function `estimate':
gwc.c:508: parse error before `long'
gwc.c:509: `first' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c:509: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
gwc.c:509: for each function it appears in.)
gwc.c:509: `last' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c: In function `toggle_marker_at':
gwc.c:931: parse error before `int'
gwc.c:934: `i' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c:937: `j' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c: In function `zoom_out':
gwc.c:978: parse error before `long'
gwc.c:980: `w' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c: In function `zoom_in':
gwc.c:1002: parse error before `long'
gwc.c:1004: `w' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c: In function `toggle_start_marker':
gwc.c:1024: parse error before `long'
gwc.c:1025: `first' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c:1025: `last' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c: In function `toggle_end_marker':
gwc.c:1037: parse error before `long'
gwc.c:1038: `first' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c:1038: `last' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c: In function `clear_markers_in_view':
gwc.c:1051: parse error before `long'
gwc.c:1054: `first' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c:1054: `last' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c:1056: `i' undeclared (first use in this function)
gwc.c: In function `main':
gwc.c:1850: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file'
make: *** [gwc.o] Error 1
[jcirillo@john1 gwc-0.19-5]$

I am stuck this time.  It's not a big deal for me, as 0.19-3 works 
fine. The way I am doing it, I edit all of the wav files 
separately and then run an autolame batch externally to get the 
mp3s, so this isn't stopping my show...
But it deserves to be reported.

John Cirillo