Re: [Gwc-general] A question regarding procedure

[Tim W. <ti...@th...>]

Well, you oughta know...

I'll try that on the rest of the tracks. I was getting some bad delick results 
on portions of the first track I worked on, perhaps that had something to do 
with it. 

Do you declick the entire track?

I've gotten into the habit of declicking 7 second intervals (or so) and 
progressing thru the track. GWC was typically finding 10-30 clicks, until it 
hit a section where there was alot of saxaphone, it'd then find hundreds of 
clicks. Much of the time, the end result was worse than the original.

Anybody else see anything like that?

On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:02 pm, someone claiming to be Jeff Welty wrote:
> This is what I do:
>
> 1) Find the "noise sample" region
> 2) Declick the "noise sample" region
> 3) Do your denoising
> 4) Finally, declick the track.
>
> The reason for this, is you don't want the noise sample to include
> clicks, which will in a sense corrupt the noise sample, because noise
> should be more or less a constant sound, whereas clicks are localized
> impulsive sound.
>
> The alternative would be to declick the whole track first, then denoise
> the whole track.  I don't have anything other than a hunch, but I am
> guessing that because declicking will tend to reduce the "energy" of the
> declicked region slightly, that the final result will not be as good as
> the method I first suggested.  This is worth of a "pepsi taste test",
> for those of us who remember what that piece of advertising was all
> about :-)
>
> jw
>
> Tim Wunder wrote:
> > Is it better to denoise a track first, then de-click it, or should the
> > de-clickig be done first?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
> The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
> Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
> www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> Gwc-general mailing list
> Gwc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general