From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-02-24 03:59:41
|
This is what I do: 1) Find the "noise sample" region 2) Declick the "noise sample" region 3) Do your denoising 4) Finally, declick the track. The reason for this, is you don't want the noise sample to include clicks, which will in a sense corrupt the noise sample, because noise should be more or less a constant sound, whereas clicks are localized impulsive sound. The alternative would be to declick the whole track first, then denoise the whole track. I don't have anything other than a hunch, but I am guessing that because declicking will tend to reduce the "energy" of the declicked region slightly, that the final result will not be as good as the method I first suggested. This is worth of a "pepsi taste test", for those of us who remember what that piece of advertising was all about :-) jw Tim Wunder wrote: > Is it better to denoise a track first, then de-click it, or should the > de-clickig be done first? > > Regards, > Tim > |