From: Jeff W. <we...@ha...> - 2009-07-12 22:43:05
|
Hi James, Thanks for the info, I'll have a look at LV2. Not much has happened on GWC recently, because it's basically a mature application. I'm only looking at doing bugfixes at this point. Lack of activity on a project does not mean lack of applicability... gwc-lib does still need some work, but seems like I've always got other priorities these days. If I had it to do over, I would take the gwc-lib approach directly. My next project will involve restoring the "lost" frequency content in older recordings. I've played around with it just a little, but I'm absolutely convinced a lot of life can be restored to those recordings with the right approach. Thanks, Jeff >> From: James Le Cuirot<ch...@au...> >> Subject: [Gwc-general] LV2 >> To: gwc...@li... >> Date: Sunday, July 12, 2009, 6:29 AM >> Hi, >> >> I know that a LADSPA implementation of GWC has been pretty >> much written >> off due to the limitations of LADSPA but I was wondering if >> the same >> limitations exist in its successor, LV2? I haven't heard >> LV2 mentioned >> much but it's supported in Audacity, which can't be bad. An >> LV2 >> implementation of GWC would also sidestep the thorny >> license issue >> concerning fftw. >> >> I am aware that things are very quiet on this project but >> the recent >> release was reassuring. I think a plug-in or library >> implementation >> would help to secure its future. >> >> Regards, >> James >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a >> limited time, >> vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App >> World(TM) will have >> the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer >> Challenge. See full prize >> details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge >> _______________________________________________ >> Gwc-general mailing list >> Gwc...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general >> >> |