From: Craig H. <cr...@hu...> - 2004-12-18 01:14:46
|
Mark, I'll need to take a look at the code -- at first blush though, it strikes me that if it's working when compiled in, but not when modular, then u-boot is not the problem. Give me a day or two to dig through the code though for a more definitive answer. In the meantime, do you in fact have a serial number when you cat /proc/cpuinfo? C On Dec 17, 2004, at 6:03 AM, Heilpern, Mark wrote: > I am using the most recent software available with Subversion with the > one exception that you caught - I have not updated u-boot. The last > time > I wanted to update u-boot I rendered my stix unoperable, and at the > moment I don't have time to take that risk if it's not essential. The > version label reported when I power up is: U-Boot 1.1.1 (Jul 23 2004 - > 16:51:30) > > For now I've worked around my network issue by causing the three > gadget-based modules to be compiled into the kernel instead. Based on > that, is there still reason to think that if I update u-boot (and go > back to using modules for the gadget pieces) that things will still > work? > > -----Original Message----- > From: gum...@li... > [mailto:gum...@li...] On Behalf Of Craig > Hughes > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:28 PM > To: gum...@li... > Subject: [SPAM] - Re: [Gumstix-users] A few things broken for me - > Email > found in subject > > On Dec 16, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Heilpern, Mark wrote: > >> Monolithic kernel: >> usb0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0A:8F:68:64:4D:0B > >> Modular kernel: >> usb0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:C2:51:AE:F9:48 > > The HWaddr with the modular kernel looks wrong -- which subversion > revision are you using? Did you update your u-boot to the new one > which > calculates a serial number to use for the usb HWaddr? cat > /proc/cpuinfo > -- if you have no serial number at the bottom there, then you need to > update u-boot. I *think* that should resolve things and make XP start > seeing the gumstix again... > > C > > ________________________________________________________ > NOTE: The information in this message is intended for the personal and > confidential use > of the designated recipient(s) named above. To the extent the > recipient(s) is/are bound > by a non-disclosure agreement, or other agreement that contains an > obligation of > confidentiality, with AuthenTec, then this message and/or any > attachments shall be > considered confidential information and subject to the confidentiality > terms of that > agreement. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient named above, you > are notified that you have received this document in error, and any > review, dissemination, > distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this > document in error, please delete the original message and notify the > sender immediately. > Thank you. > > AuthenTec, Inc. http://www.authentec.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real > users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |