Re: [Gumstix-users] opkg repo are empty in current repo image

[JamesAng <ang...@gm...>]

Good day Adam,

Is using Zypper much better than the Opkg tool as before?

It would be helpful if the page at Gumstix has an updated section on the use
of Zypper and a short comparison note on the pitfalls against each of them.

Thanks.

James Ang.


adam wrote
> Good morning James,
> 
> I was able to find a cheat sheet on Zypper for the Debian/Ubuntu users:
> http://lilypond.org/blog/jan/openSUSE-HOWTO
> 
> If this isn't what you were looking for, let me know!
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:52 PM, James Ang <

> angweiyang@

> > wrote:
> 
>> Hi Ash,
>>
>> Is there an updated page for using Zypper as the Package Management Tool
>> for Yocto image?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> James Ang.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Ash Charles <

> ashcharles@

> > wrote:
>>
>>> The opkg repositories are still as given here:
>>> http://gumstix.org/add-software-packages.html
>>>
>>> We've got a newer zypper repository here:
>>> http://package-cache.gumstix.org/ for use with the current yocto
>>> images (
>>> https://github.com/gumstix/meta-gumstix-extras/blob/danny/recipes-extended/zypper/zypper/gumstix.repo
>>> )
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:43 AM, kris duff <

> t_dufff@

> > wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have built the gumstix-console-image with the latest version
>>> software.
>>> >
>>> > I'm trying to install task-native-sdk to natively compile on the
>>> gumstix
>>> > (overo).
>>> >
>>> > I added the opkg package in the image and now there is no repo in
>>> > /etc/opkg/*.conf
>>> >
>>> > I know where is the repo, so I did manually the update, but how can I
>>> add
>>> > the configuration file in the image when I bitbake it ?
>>> >
>>> > Thank you!





--
View this message in context: http://gumstix.8.x6.nabble.com/opkg-repo-are-empty-in-current-repo-image-tp4967240p4967248.html
Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.