From: Dave H. <dhy...@gm...> - 2011-10-13 06:08:23
|
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha <qu...@du...> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:50 AM, rcorley <rc...@ae...> wrote: >> The bitbake -c compile -f virtual/kernel command worked as I hoped. >> >> I followed it with a bitbake -c build -f virtual/kernel to build the image >> file >> >> Too bad I had to post this one to figure it out. I took a bit of time >> online to see if this information was out there on the web. No salient >> results from a search on "bitbake -c build". >> >> Seems like this little tidbit is important (it is to me, at least). > > Please do add it to the Wiki. It won't help you but it would help > some other poor sot in the future: So I recently discovered the same thing. This page on the wiki: http://wiki.gumstix.org/index.php?title=Kernel_Reconfiguration has a link to this page, which is where I saw the appropriate bitbake instructions to use. http://blogs.elphel.com/2009/12/openembeddedangstrom-kernel-workflow/ So adding the information to that page seems like a reasonable place (to me). The Kernel Reconfiguration page mentions doing a bitbake -c clean virtual/kernel which is typically overkill, even for a modified kernel configuration (altough there are probably esoteric occasions where it is warranted). Having both options presented seems like a reasonable thing. -- Dave Hylands Shuswap, BC, Canada http://www.davehylands.com |