From: dtran11 <dt...@gm...> - 2011-03-20 04:23:51
|
Thanks for your suggestions. The command however did not work for me. I did get it to work if I set them on different subnets, which is kind of disappointing. Thanks again. Steve Modica wrote: > > > On Mar 19, 2011, at 6:57 PM, dtran11 wrote: > >> >> I have two network interfaces: usb0 (g_ether) and wlan0 (onboard wifi). >> Both >> interfaces use static IP's. By itself, each interface works. But if both >> of >> them are up, then only the first one that gets configured works. My >> method >> of testing is with ping. Is there a routing issue? I am not familiar with >> the routing table but it would help me out if someone can confirm that it >> is >> a routing issue and not a hardware issue. > > > It's probably a routing issue. have you tried deleting the default route > and recreating it? You should be able to load "ip" and use that like so: > > ip r del "default" > > you can see the route table in /proc/net/route > -- > Steve Modica > CTO - Small Tree Communications > www.small-tree.com > phone: 651-209-6509 ext 301 > mobile: 651-261-3201 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/g_ether-and-wifi-coexist-tp31191779p31192496.html Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |