From: Nik <ni...@ni...> - 2010-10-12 00:08:59
|
So I forced the build to continue using the -k option on bitbake and get an image. Anyone know what is up with libvbx? On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 16:21 -0400, N Twerdochlib wrote: > I am now running on a completely new build environment, pulled from > git://gitorious.org/gumstix-oe/mainline.git > > > > I cannot get the build past this error? (which shows as a warning) > > > > nik@bobbob:~/development/gumstix$ bitbake > -b /home/nik/development/gumstix/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/webm/libvpx_0.9.1.bb > > NOTE: Preparing runqueue > > NOTE: Executing runqueue > > NOTE: Running task 7 of 17 (ID: > 13, /home/nik/development/gumstix/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/webm/libvpx_0.9.1.bb, do_compile) > > NOTE: package libvpx-0.9.1-r1: task do_compile: Started > > NOTE: Running task 8 of 17 (ID: > 15, /home/nik/development/gumstix/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/webm/libvpx_0.9.1.bb, do_distribute_sources) > > NOTE: package libvpx-0.9.1-r1: task do_distribute_sources: Started > > NOTE: package libvpx-0.9.1-r1: task do_distribute_sources: Succeeded > > ERROR: Task 13 > (/home/nik/development/gumstix/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/webm/libvpx_0.9.1.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code '1' > > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored > in: /home/nik/development/gumstix/tmp.overo.6/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libvpx-0.9.1-r1/temp/log.do_compile.25116 > > Log data follows: > > | NOTE: make -j 4 > > | /home/nik/development/gumstix/tmp.overo.6/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libvpx-0.9.1-r1/libvpx-0.9.1/vp8/vp8_common.mk:184: warning: overriding commands for target `vpx_asm_offsets.asm' > > | /home/nik/development/gumstix/tmp.overo.6/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libvpx-0.9.1-r1/libvpx-0.9.1/vp8/vp8_common.mk:184: warning: ignoring old commands for target `vpx_asm_offsets.asm' > > | make: *** [.DEFAULT] Error 2 > > | FATAL: oe_runmake failed > > NOTE: package libvpx-0.9.1-r1: task do_compile: Failed > > ERROR: Function 'do_compile' failed > (see /home/nik/development/gumstix/tmp.overo.6/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libvpx-0.9.1-r1/temp/log.do_compile.25116 for further information) > > > > Anyone know what might be happening? > > > > Thanks, > > Nik > > > > From: N Twerdochlib [mailto:ni...@ni...] > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 7:59 PM > To: gum...@li... > Subject: [Gumstix-users] What is wrong with clean builds? > > > > > I just created a clean build environment, reset all required configs > and I can not get any builds to work? > > > > example error: > > > > OE:overo nik@bobbob:~/development/oe$ bitbake task-base-nfs > > NOTE: Handling BitBake files: / (7092/7092) [100 %] > > Parsing of 7092 .bb files complete (6631 cached, 461 parsed). 7223 > targets, 322 skipped, 2 masked, 0 errors. > > ERROR: > '['/home/nik/development/oe/openembedded/recipes/tasks/task-boot.bb']' > RDEPENDS/RRECOMMENDS or otherwise requires the runtime entity > 'opkg-nogpg-nocurl' but it wasn't found in any PACKAGE or RPROVIDES > variables > > ERROR: Required build target 'task-base-nfs' has no buildable > providers. > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-base-nfs', > 'task-boot', 'opkg-nogpg-nocurl'] > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > > ERROR: > '['/home/nik/development/oe/openembedded/recipes/tasks/task-boot.bb']' > RDEPENDS/RRECOMMENDS or otherwise requires the runtime entity > 'opkg-nogpg-nocurl' but it wasn't found in any PACKAGE or RPROVIDES > variables > > Unknown Event: <bb.event.NoProvider instance at 0x10d94e0c> > > NOTE: Runtime target 'opkg-nogpg-nocurl' is unbuildable, removing... > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['opkg-nogpg-nocurl'] > > ERROR: Required build target 'task-base-nfs' has no buildable > providers. > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-base-nfs', > 'task-boot', 'opkg-nogpg-nocurl'] > > Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/command.py", > line 88, in runAsyncCommand > > commandmethod(self.cmds_async, self, options) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/command.py", > line 174, in buildTargets > > command.cooker.buildTargets(pkgs_to_build, task) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/cooker.py", > line 784, in buildTargets > > taskdata.add_unresolved(localdata, self.status) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/taskdata.py", > line 562, in add_unresolved > > self.remove_runtarget(self.getrun_id(target)) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/taskdata.py", > line 535, in remove_runtarget > > self.fail_fnid(fnid, missing_list) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/taskdata.py", > line 490, in fail_fnid > > self.remove_buildtarget(target, missing_list) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/taskdata.py", > line 510, in remove_buildtarget > > self.fail_fnid(fnid, missing_list) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/taskdata.py", > line 490, in fail_fnid > > self.remove_buildtarget(target, missing_list) > > File "/home/nik/development/oe/bitbake-1.10.0/lib/bb/taskdata.py", > line 519, in remove_buildtarget > > raise bb.providers.NoProvider > > NoProvider > > > > Everything was good up until I did a git pull. Did something change > that might need to be updated on the "Getting Started" gumstix page? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > _______________________________________________ gumstix-users mailing list gum...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |