From: Søren S. C. <li...@ss...> - 2010-06-05 10:54:19
|
OK - Thanks for correcting me. The chip I was referring to is the one encircled in red I the attached image. I admit it has been a while since I looked into this (trying to figure out if I could shutdown the HF oscillator in any way - Realized that I couldn't :-(). AFAIR I found this chip to be a LDO for the oscillator - Isn't this correct? Might be it is 1V8 LDO though, meaning it would most likely have no problem going below 3V0 - I don't remember... To make sure we are aligned. Does this mean that the COM module can actually run down to the TPS65950 limit of 2V7 (when it's first turned on)? Until now I have always just the module at 3V3 since I have not been in any serious power savings need for a product based on a Gumstix yet... Best regards and thanks again Søren --- SSC Solutions ApS - Denmark - www.ssc-solutions.dk > -----Original Message----- > From: R. P. McMurphy [mailto:log...@gm...] > Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 12:40 PM > To: General mailing list for gumstix users. > Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] Overo COM input voltage > > >> I think to remember that the VSYSTEM as well is feed through a 3V > (or 1V8 - > I don't remember) regulator next to TPS65950 on the board. This might > be the > reason why the COM module doesn't like going much lower than the 3V1 > found > by R. P. McMurphy. > > No, I think the reason is that there is a reset generator IC that > forces reset if the input voltage is too low. Note that the Overo > module will reliably start at, or above, 3.1V. And once started can > run okay with the voltage down to lower than 3.0V. The reason I state > 3.1V is that we have to be able to get the thing out of reset if the > power is lost, and anything below ~3.1V just does nothing at start-up. > > On 6/5/10, Søren Steen Christensen <li...@ss...> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think to remember that the VSYSTEM as well is feed through a 3V (or > 1V8 - > > I don't remember) regulator next to TPS65950 on the board. This might > be the > > reason why the COM module doesn't like going much lower than the 3V1 > found > > by R. P. McMurphy. TPS65950 can run down to 2V7 when it's first > turned on as > > stated previously in the snippet from the datasheet, but this of > cause > > doesn't help much in case the rest of the module can't :-) > > > > Secondly: Please keep in mind that 4V5 is absolute maximum rating for > > TPS65950 (although it can tolerate 5V2 spikes for up to 10ms), so I > wouldn't > > design with supplying it from a source higher than 4V40 - 4V45 (just > to have > > a little margin)... > > > > Good luck with your project > > Søren > > > > --- > > SSC Solutions ApS - Denmark - www.ssc-solutions.dk > > > >> I have had no trouble with 4.5V input. The PMIC can handle that. > >> > >> Voltages less than 3.0V sometimes give me trouble. Some units run > and > >> some don't. But 3.1V has always gives me reliable operation once the > >> unit has started. I suspect 3.0V would probably be a safe minimum > >> value to use to ensure reliable operation. > >> > >> On 5/24/10, James Adams <jam...@gm...> wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > I would like to drive my COM module from a Li-Ion battery + > charger > >> IC > >> > [Ti BQ24032] which will drive a maximum of 4.4V to the system > (when > >> > the AC power is present). > >> > > >> > The 'docs' spec the input voltage to the COM as 3.3-4.2V. > >> > > >> > Is there anything else on the COM module which restricts the > voltage > >> > range or can I drive max 4.4V, and will the unit (once turned on) > >> keep > >> > going down to 2V7? > >> > > >> > NB I know the TPS65950 won't turn on unless there is 3.2V (+/- > 100mV) > >> > present, the magic line from the spec says: > >> > > >> > "(1) 2.7 V is the minimum threshold for the battery at which the > >> > device will turn OFF. However, the minimum voltage at which the > >> device > >> > will > >> > power ON is 3.2 V ±100 mV (if PWRON does not have a switch and is > >> > connected to VBAT) considering battery plug as the device > >> > switch on event. If PWRON has a switch then 3.2 V is the minimum > for > >> > the device to turn ON." > >> > > >> > Thanks in advance, > >> > > >> > James. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > > _______________________________________________ > > gumstix-users mailing list > > gum...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2919 - Release Date: > 06/05/10 08:25:00 |