Re: [Gumstix-users] Summit header: gpio0_wakeup or gpio10_wakeup

[Frank A. <ft...@ya...>]

Don Anderson wrote:
> Hi Frank
> 
> Thanks for picking this up.
> 
> Both charts @ gumstix.net <http://gumstix.net> now show the same signal 
> name: GPIO0_wakeup.
> 
> i.e. GPIO followed by the digit zero followed by underscore then wakeup.
> 
> 
> Don
> @ Gumstix
> ====================

Don,

The OMAP35x Applications Processor reference manual lists the alternate 
function for gpio_0 as sys_nirq, so shouldn't pin 13 of the Summit 
header be labeled "GPIO0_NIRQ" and not "GPIO0_WAKEUP"?  Also, from the 
reference manual, the alternate function for gpio_114 is csi2_dx1, so 
pin 4 of the summit header should be "GPIO114_CSI2_DX1", not 
GPIO114_SPI1_NIRQ".  The labels for GPIO127_TS_IRQ and GPIO128_GPS_PPS 
don't look right either.

frank