From: Chris D. <chr...@gm...> - 2008-07-02 14:12:19
|
Yes, it is binary incompatibility between uclibc and glibc. The easiest thing to do if you want to compile with buildroot is to flash a filesystem and kernel built with buildroot. Chris On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Peter Vandrish <pet...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > I noticed that, when I cross compiled some software for my gumstix running > an OE built OS, if I compiled the software using the buildroot chain the OS > could not > execute the binary. I got the error "-sh: euler: not found". Is that > because it is using uclibc instead of glibc? To get my software to work I > had to compile it using the stuff in the cross folder of my gumstix-oe > directory. I thought that, as long as it is an arm compiler, the code should > execute properly. > Thanks,\ > Peter > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > > |